Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lucretius who wrote (42739)	11/30/2000 10:41:02 PM
From: pater tenebrarum	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

i actually doubt that the pure Fed model is really applicable. a model incorporating corporate bond yields may have more validity. i believe someone has already constructed such a model...dimly remember having read about it, can't remember the exact formula though.

To: Lucretius who wrote (42739)	12/1/2000 6:37:03 AM
From: Box-By-The-Riviera™	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

this is way old now.....but do you think yardeni has much credability left??? particularly after his nearly hysterical warnings on y2k in 1999. J

To: Lucretius who wrote (42739)	12/1/2000 6:50:44 AM
From: AllansAlias	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

Vodoo machine 2, Luc 2 (Only climbed up to 2 'cause he was right once in October when the stupid voodoo machine thought we had a rally.) See them futures? Did ya buy any calls when we hit the bottom of my dung flag yesterday? -vbg I surely welcome the coming opportunity. I hope index puts go on sale today 'cause I have none left. It will be most interesting to gauge the eagerness of the permabulls to jump back in here. Another factor for me is to see how long/if bad news is bought, 'cuase more is coming. Although yesterday's damage was contained, there is little doubt in my mind that is is telegraphing more down, and soon.