SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Scumbria who wrote (120022)11/30/2000 9:51:35 PM
From: Elmer  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
Re: "The court will not hear the case if it has no material significance. Obviously one of us is not using our head"

Clearly the SC wanted to review the matter of partisan State SCs inventing election law to help their man after the election is over. This is still a major legal issue that must be addressed. Get a clue.

EP



To: Scumbria who wrote (120022)12/1/2000 2:40:49 PM
From: ratan lal  Respond to of 186894
 
The court will not hear the case if it has no material significance

SC of US already heard the case.

They may come back with no decision. In which case the Florida SC ruling stands.

Based on what I heard tody, I beleive the US SC will abstain from giving a ruling. JMHO


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News