Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: zonkie who wrote (96776)	12/1/2000 3:04:01 AM
From: Neocon	Respond to of 769670

I am sorry to have bored you. Actually, you are not very good at reading between the lines......

To: zonkie who wrote (96776)	12/1/2000 10:31:10 AM
From: Michael M	Respond to of 769670

He didn't need to mention them. Seemed clear enough.

To: zonkie who wrote (96776)	12/1/2000 2:36:35 PM
From: zonkie	Respond to of 769670

There are many different ways the US Supreme court may rule. They are not limited to just ruling in favor Of Bush Jr or Gore. One possibility..... The US Supreme Court will decide whether the Florida Supreme Court's decision to allow recounts to continue till Nov 26th was within their authority. Their ruling on this matter may not have a significant bearing on the events in Florida one way or another unless they offer an opinion on what should be done now if they rule in favor of Gore. If they rule that the state court was acting within their bounds they then have the option as to whether what the FSC's intention was was followed out. If they feel that the state's court intention was not carried out then they have it within their power to give an opinion on what may now be done to rectify the events that have transpired since Harris certified the vote. This is what is most important, not whether they rule in favor of Bush or Gore but what they say (if they say) will be done about it now. They could rule that when the state court ruled in favor of the hand recounts that the counties then had an obligation to complete those recounts. If so what will they say the state should do now?