Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (96797)	12/1/2000 8:04:21 AM
From: sunshadow	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

"My best guess is that the U.S. Supreme Court will do nothing but send it back to the Florida Supreme Court with their blessings, I just don't think the U.S. Supreme Court judges will want to dirty their hands and tarnish their image by taking sides....." GZ, if your take is correct then pray tell why in the world did they take the case ? If they do punt (and they won't) then they have tarnished their image. The Supreme Court does not "take sides" in the way the FLSC did/does... it's function is to preserve the Constitution and the rule of law.

To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (96797)	12/1/2000 1:30:41 PM
From: Dan B.	Respond to of 769670

Well, I see that the law may allow them to intervene without literally taking sides. We'll see. I'd heard liberal experts saying the Fla. Supreme Court wouldn't likely do what it eventually did, because THAT would be construed as taking sides. We'll see. Dan B