Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Trading the markets..... -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: William H Huebl who wrote (1098)	12/1/2000 6:14:55 AM
From: GROUND ZERO™	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4583

Uhh... I forget.....<g> GZ

To: William H Huebl who wrote (1098)	12/2/2000 2:48:35 PM
From: Mephisto	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 4583

Any bets on how The Supreme Court will rule? I wonder if they won't say, "we don't have a remedy." In other words, they'll stay out of it although there may be a few dissenting votes. I watched The Supreme Court dissect Bush and Gore's cases on PBS last night. Here are a couple of points that were made: "To the pleasure of Republicans, Justice Sandra Day O'Connor said the Florida Supreme Court's decision to allow more time for manual recounts ``does look like a very dramatic change'' from state law. Democrats could be encouraged by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. ``I do not know of any case where we have impugned a state supreme court in the way you have,'' she told Bush lawyer Theodore Olson. ``We owe the highest respect to the state court when it says what the state law is." Excerpt from: Fla. Battle Returns to Tallahassee By LARRY NEUMEISTER, Associated Press Writer dailynews.yahoo.com