Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Why is Gore Trying to Steal the Presidency? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: The Philosopher who wrote (3183)	12/1/2000 11:42:40 AM
From: The Duke of URL©	Respond to of 3887

Maybe I was hasty in thinking Ellen finally got one right You know what "they" say; "Act in haste, repent about 500 responsive posts later. :))) BTW, If truth be known, I am pretty much unbiased in the subject matter of this thread. P.S. The USSC is meeting now. The case is being initially argued by Ted Olson, who Dershowitz and others beliveve is a very competent attorney. This will be a refreshing change for Bush. Early reports, however, from Roger Cossak, (sp) indicate the Court's concern is why they are hearing the case. Either it is not "ripe" or 'so far what has Florida done to create a Federal issue'. Duke

To: The Philosopher who wrote (3183)	12/1/2000 11:49:34 AM
From: Ellen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3887

> Maybe I was hasty in thinking Ellen finally got one right. < Just because you didn't agree with what I posted about the statutes applicable to the Seminole County case does not mean that was incorrect. And, as a matter of fact, you are in the great minority of one (1) [unless DoU makes two] in your belief. Read the articles on the case - they say the law was broken. Nice try though. Attitudes such as yours are what foster divisiveness, partisanship, discord, and ill feelings. Not something I would be proud of, but whatever floats your boat...