Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Road Walker who wrote (120171)	12/1/2000 5:34:11 PM
From: NITT	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

re" The press is also putting Kennedy as neutral, I must have mis-read" It's hard to "read into" the Justices' questions... in some cases they may have an opinion for one side based on a brief and they are challenging him/her just to see if their initial view strengthens and sometimes they play it the other way, they didn't see the merits in the case so they go after the lawyer. The "experts" are trying to read into a Justices previous decision as well as the questions they ask, problem is things are sometime contradictory. If you just listed to on side other the other, you would assume the other side lost in this case and in many other cases. It’s time to wait and see. My guess is they may stall to see if this works itself out, and then they can decide not to decide. Nitt