Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: maverick61 who wrote (97642)	12/1/2000 6:00:34 PM
From: Ellen	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769667

Well, that was a question and not an opinion. And I asked because there was such a large difference in Bush's lead from the original count to the 2nd count (the automatic vote tabulation). His lead dropped by 85%. So the question still is - Is this not the case here? There is that large % difference in the lead and it was even a further drop under the % error for the machines. Seemed like a logical question. I'd really like to hear an educated answer for that. Does/Doesn't this create the circumstances under which a full manual recount is mandated? ----- (5) If the manual recount indicates an error in the vote tabulation which could affect the outcome of the election, the county canvassing board shall: