Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: The Duke of URL© who wrote (120200)	12/1/2000 8:39:08 PM
From: Elmer	Respond to of 186894

Thanks for your perspective. EP

To: The Duke of URL© who wrote (120200)	12/1/2000 9:09:52 PM
From: The Duke of URL©	Respond to of 186894

I will also add that sleeze factor may also be present, and if so, may not be ignored. It is my understanding that after the affidavit was amended, the amended or changed affidavit WAS NOT delivered to the recount committee of the county. That it is possible or arguable that the "Illinois" attorney did not bother to amend his affidavit until after he was reminded or recollected the actual facts; And, although, I listened to Boies argue, there was a time when I did not follow his argument and it may be that he steered the Judge's attention away from the holding of the case, but I would have review the transcript to be sure. All of the above and the post that this is in response to are my random musings, from what I have gleaned from third party sources, which I believe are accurate.