Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : VOLTAIRE'S PORCH-MODERATED -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kayaker who wrote (21561)	12/1/2000 11:59:56 PM
From: techguerrilla	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 65232

Yep!!! Absolutely!! Si!! I really consider that one to be a total and complete no-brainer. Clarence Thomas shouldn't have been put on the United States Supreme Court because he's a no-brainer. Frankly, I don't care what his sexual perversions entail. But for Republican committee members to have tried to tear apart Anita Hill and legitimize Thomas was one of the biggest jokes of the second half of the 20th Century. What an embarrassment Thomas is to the United States Supreme Court. I may disagree with conservative legal positions. But Thomas is a disgrace. Rehnquist, O'Connor, Souter, and Scalia are at least intellectuals who try to rationalize conservative opinions. I respect that. /john