Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: lawdog who wrote (98242)	12/2/2000 10:10:31 AM
From: Don Pueblo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

we don't know what they did. That's the first true thing you have said about this. If you weren't there, why not wait for the actual facts to be presented? Just a thought.

To: lawdog who wrote (98242)	12/2/2000 10:21:06 AM
From: sunshadow	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769667

For argument sake for the moment, let's assume they only added the missing ID. It is said/has been said that it is the voters responsibility to do his own application, right ? So now we have a third party (the Repubs) filling out part of the app... If I understand it correctly this ID was suppose to be part of the preprinted app meaning the voter would have not filled that part out... it would have already been done by a third party, the printer. Is the printer a legal ok, but not the Repub/Demo ? Is their a statue that states that ID must be on the app before anything else or can it be put on form at any time, even by a third party facilitator ? Not quite sure there is a problem here of consequence... I am not trying to be cute, I really want to understand this. Thanks for your rebuttal. David