SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : KOB.TO - East Lost Hills & GSJB joint venture -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: MIRU who wrote (12995)12/5/2000 2:52:34 PM
From: grayhairs  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 15703
 
Hi nostarch.

<<...because a faster rate increases the current value of the same reserves.>>

Not necessarily. It depends entirely upon the price forecast\schedule. For example (and simplicity), a California gas well that produced 40MM/d in 2000 would have generated far less profit (value) than one that produced 20 MM/d in 2000 and 20 MM/d in 2001.

One "values" ELH reserves based upon a "pool" production rate and product pricing over the life of the "pool", not just the "front end" profile for one or two wells. The ELH reserves are gigantic (multi TCF) and will require many, many more wells to exploit and produce the reserves in the next ~30 years. JMHOBWDIK.

Later,
grayhairs



To: MIRU who wrote (12995)12/5/2000 3:02:11 PM
From: grayhairs  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 15703
 
Hi again nostarch.

I forgot to comment on the following,

<<... a company with a 50-50 oil/gas reserve breakdown would be revalued upwards by 50%, using the same napkin.>>

I would assume that your +50% revaluation is a function of only "pricing" and not due to a simple change in gas/oil conversion. If not, then I may be interested in contracting you to work some magic on my private companys' balance sheets !!! <gg>

Later,
grayhairs