Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rarebird who wrote (61623)	12/2/2000 1:49:40 PM
From: Daveyk	Respond to of 116762

Say you hypothetically had $100K you wanted to invest in gold and or gold stocks;how would you divide it up?TIA Dave

To: Rarebird who wrote (61623)	12/2/2000 8:39:39 PM
From: long-gone	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 116762

<<Yes, but there is no need to make the situation any worse than it already is. I'm assuming, of course, that your not interested in outright civil war again.>> There are those that say Al Gore is currently in talks to use the military of BOTH Russia & China to force his installation as President - If Bush wins. An actual violent coup. <<I merely want to point out again, Richard, that the Crisis that you have been desperately looking for (in the form of Wars) to help stimulate the POG has arrived>> You forget, my friend, despite I put forward many items from teh broad category of "Doom & Gloom", I'm the only one that said if the good times are good enough & last long enough gold will - in the end - move up based on jewelry, industrial,& collectable demand alone. I'm the one voice that said - "The better it is, the better it will be"! BUT I'll Take a WIN - no matter the source!!!!!!!!!

To: Rarebird who wrote (61623)	12/2/2000 8:44:45 PM
From: long-gone	Respond to of 116762

sorry forgot to address this: <<However, I see no evidence thus far that a Bush Administration would be friendlier to the Gold Market than Clinton/Gore, as you presume. Control and Manipulation are essential ingredients of all Administrations, whether it be Republican or Democratic. To lose Control means a much higher POG. Neither Administration wants that, though Bush may tolerate a higher POG than Gore.>> I don't think Bush is in bed with, or on as good of terms with the manipulators. Bush may even be ready for a far higher POG!!!! If the shorts & the bullion bankers are NOT any longer working in concerted effort with(yes, you may read illegal conspiracy here) the Treasury of the US, the IMF, & some key CB's in Europe there will be no "agreement " on price of gold & it will therefor be higher - & in the explosion - far higher.