Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (62216)	12/2/2000 2:44:23 PM
From: pompsander	Respond to of 93625

I also want to congratulate my close friend and brother in the Bus, Bilow, on a great call Thursday. When I read it I lifted the razor blade from my wrist and knew the world had shifted....Bilow was backing a buy of Rambus!

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (62216)	12/2/2000 2:46:20 PM
From: pompsander	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93625

Zeev: I seem to recall (and correct me if wrong - which is often) that last Summer you felt this correction was not going to happen until 2001, at which time you saw something very like what has happened now. How do you see things at this point. If you have already pontificated on the subject and I missed it, sorry.

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (62216)	12/2/2000 3:02:04 PM
From: Bruce A. Thompson	Respond to of 93625

Hi Zeev, That's an interesting theory. I did not have sex with that woman! What about the semen stains on Monica's blue dress that DNA tests proved to be Billy's? He had to admit the lie after the disclosure. A little something you might find interesting...http://aha-public.lanl.gov/cgi-bin/tools/aha/aha.cgi?category_path=%2FPhysics%2FSuperconductivity BT

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (62216)	12/2/2000 3:05:12 PM
From: Dave B	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 93625

Zeev, Dave, so far as I know, no court has determined that Billy actually lied under oath (about the blow job), the house indicted, but the Senate let him go free. Thus, like OJ, we really do not know if he lied under oath, That actually wasn't the issue that started this discussion again (whether or not he was guilty, that is). It was Scumbria's inherent claim that he was indicted for the sex, not for the lying, which was an invalid claim. He was impeached for lying under oath. as i mentioned to you before, there are some schools of thought (religions) that do not consider a "blow job" a "sexual relationship", There are also schools of thought (religions) that think it's okay to shrink heads. Unfortunately, you were not able to offer any evidence that either of these religions apply to Bill Clinton. When I asked for leads to recreate your research, you then claimed your wife had done the research and were not able to supply any for me to follow up on. What has that to do with the price of the "Bu$$". I don't know. I thought it was a dead issue again until Scumbria posted to me this morning. Dave p.s. Also, my congratulations to Carl for his call. And while I don't mean to belittle his achievement, there were many, many stocks that turned at the same time. I'd say that his achievement was calling a bottom overall, and it was an excellent call.