Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dan B. who wrote (98592)	12/2/2000 4:38:28 PM
From: PartyTime	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769667

It depends on whether the court rules there was equal protection, that Democrats were afforded the same treatment the Republicans got. However, it being a Republican-dominated county, it's doubt that the supervisor would have left Democrats alone, with a laptop, in the County databank and election technology officer's facility. The supervisor has testified she made no effort to get the Democrats voter IDs numbers recorded so they could receive ballots. The plaintiff, Mr. Jacobs, claims he has a friendship with a couple--one a GOP, one a DEM--where the Republican wife got the absentee ballot mailed, whereas the Democrat husband had to go get his. On the surface, it seems an unfair tilt advantage to the GOPside and a possible equal protection violation.