To: Sully- who wrote (33941 ) 12/2/2000 5:53:39 PM From: Poet Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 35685 Tim, Your invective mastery has slipped a bit in that one. Sorry. Lots of words, not a whole lot of meaning.Perhaps a harsh reality is revealed, but the descriptions are quite accurate by definition. I actually have no idea what this sentence means to you. It certainly makes no sense to me. The following, however, I do understand:If you wish to debate my comments in the post you have attacked, I will gladly provide a list of verbatim quotes that prompted my reply. It could cause more folks to feel ashamed for sure. You're saying you're willing to cull through all of Bonnie's old posts to show me that you don't like what she said. Am I right? You think this will make her feel ashamed. Am I right? And yet you're eager to provide me with this most generous service. See Tim, this is why I don't like you. You appear to enjoy the shame of others. And I mean really revel in it. I read your posts and there is really very little of substance with regard to investing in general or stocks in particular. I see right-wing political rants, I see brief posts in which you support your friends, but far and away your longest and most frequent posts involve an attack on a poster. These include snippets of their previous postings, a fair measure of innuendo and the repetition of one of your favorite (though perfectly meaningless) phrases "the truth hurts". You enjoy this, don't you Tim, hurting people over and over again with your brand of truth? I see that nolimitz (please note the correct spelling of his screen name) has placed you on full ignore. I've considered doing the same, but I never turn my back on sadists. Now, we've been having a couple of perfectly enjoyable conversations here on the LWP, one on the Supreme Court's action today and another on options trading. Feel free to join us if you are able to contribute.