Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tom Pulley who wrote (62257)	12/3/2000 10:47:01 AM
From: Scumbria	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93625

Tom, Good answer. I'm having a little bit of trouble imagining Bill and Hillary talking to each other like that, however. ;^) Scumbria

To: Tom Pulley who wrote (62257)	12/3/2000 11:56:29 AM
From: Zeev Hed	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 93625

Tom, you are missing the point, Clinton and Gingrich have both committed adultery in the "court of public opinion" (namely, your wife or my wife or most people in the country), the point is whether or not they considered this peculiar behavior of consistently "not going all the way" religiously justifiable as "not adultery". That is why I was asking if there are experts in our midst that can clarify this. After all, Clinton was indicted, but not convicted, and thus loosely say that he committed perjury, may not be correct, as much as we all despise the itch the man has behind his zipper. So far, the court( The Senate in this case) decided that he either did not commit perjury or that if he did, that offense did not rise to the level of of "High crime and misdemeanor" Zeev