SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (99313)12/3/2000 10:48:10 AM
From: PartyTime  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
jokeofalltrades.com



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (99313)12/3/2000 11:01:47 AM
From: Don Pueblo  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
If you believe that, then you should sue Harris. I am totally serious. If you think Harris broke the law, then you should sue her. My humble suggestion would be to see what the United States Supreme Court has to say about it before you file, so you don't waste any money.

You are operating under the assumption that I have some ax to grind with Al Gore or the Democratic Party. Your argument presupposes that I would argue against what I am arguing if my political party were different.

That argument presupposes that one party is honorable and one is not.

I find that viewpoint extremely offensive. It's the same bullshit argument that Rush Limbaugh uses, that Jesse Jackson uses, that anyone that feels the need to relate this whole thing to politics uses. If you want to focus on politics as bottom line, then that's fine. But if you do, don't assume that I do too, because I don't. I think there is good and bad in both political parties.

You don't need to patronize me by forwarding your goofy argument that I am some sort of criminal and I will argue whatever side of the argument I need to so that I can get what I want. The fact of the matter is that I don't care what your party is. I couldn't care less what your party is. All I care about is truth, honesty and integrity. If you want to talk about a liberal agenda, that's fine. If you want to slam some dillweed Republican because he is a racist, that's fine with me.

But if you approach this from the standpoint that I would be acting like Al Gore if the situation were reversed, you have lost your argument with me, because I don't look at this from a Republican vs. Democrat viewpoint. I look at it as a Legal vs. Illegal viewpoint.

I'm not stupid. I KNOW who is trying to break the law here, and I know why he is doing it. Post whatever articles you want, but I know what's going on. Nobody needs to explain to me who is trying to break the law here. It's about as clear as it can be.

Is that clear to you?



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (99313)12/3/2000 3:38:01 PM
From: Dan B.  Respond to of 769670
 
Re: "in the same manner as Harris" Pardon me, but if you equate Chicken's charge with Harris's actions, you hold one one sick bias, IMO.

Dan B