SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : All About Sun Microsystems -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Charles Tutt who wrote (38509)12/3/2000 3:22:54 PM
From: QwikSand  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 64865
 
You want to be even more spooked? Read this:

latimes.com

An L.A. Times article about how the collapsing wealth effect will affect the economy (not benignly). This isn't from the Big Bad Bear website or anything, it's centerline mainstream journalism. The recession ball is no longer rolling down the alley. The pocket has been hit, the pins are falling, and next year President Dubya will find himself presiding over a 7-10 split. I'm not counting on any magic rallies for SUNW or anything else, not sustainable ones, not for a while.

Long term investors don't need to be as concerned (depending on what we mean by "long-term"), but I'm not sure this is a great time to be highly concentrated.

Here's an excerpt:

But investment does not just slow down when excess capacity appears. It stops. The capacity embodied in new capital equipment cannot be laid off. It has been bought and paid for, probably through borrowing. If too much information-technology equipment is on hand, IT orders are eliminated. That is why investment-led booms end suddenly.

If IT investment, which has accounted for virtually all investment and productivity growth since 1996, drops to zero, total U.S. growth will be cut by 1.5% to 2%. Productivity growth also would drop sharply, perhaps back to 1%. Real labor costs would rise, and a combination of rising labor costs and reduced pricing power (weakened by excess capacity) would depress profits. Stock prices would fall rapidly, especially in the face of dashed hopes of earnings of 30% a year or higher
.

--QS



To: Charles Tutt who wrote (38509)12/4/2000 3:44:29 AM
From: JC Jaros  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 64865
 
...terrible beating...

Me too. For some reason though, I'm the least concerned
with SUNW. If there was ever a time to hold this kind of
quality...

I'd be a lot more nervous sitting on cash trying to time an
entry.

(except for the fact that I'm calling the bottom here <g>)

-JCJ