Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: PartyTime who wrote (99476)	12/3/2000 3:02:41 PM
From: JLIHAI	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

You forgot the precedent where the legal technicalities were not sufficient to override the will of the people in a certified election.

To: PartyTime who wrote (99476)	12/3/2000 3:05:00 PM
From: Jerry Miller	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

excellent piece, PT. where's that fat lady ?

To: PartyTime who wrote (99476)	12/3/2000 3:50:12 PM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Frivolous. That case dealt with tampered ballots. Here the applications are alleged to have been tampered. The ballots are quite clear evidence of the voters' intent (unlike the cited case) and no one has alleged the ballots themselves have been tampered with. The votes will stand. No Court will disenfranchise 15,000 voters over such a technicality. JLA