Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : TSIG.com TIGI (formerly TSIG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TideGlider who wrote (43433)	12/3/2000 4:54:14 PM
From: ztect	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 44908

Wrong TG... Just putting what occurred in perspective. Plus get who you're addressing correct. First you wrote "you and Suzanne", then you wrote "you and ztect". Should I surmise that from your mistake that you can't even keep straight who you're talking to and therefore are not even capable of making another coherent or capable argument? No, don't think so. Again my only point, was that in lieu of the consent agreements, the journalistic accounts were sensationalized. If the media didn't sensationalize, they wouldn't have as large an audience. If the transgressions were great, consent agreements wouldn't have been made and penalties would have been imposed including preventing continued operations. Read through the dockets, and they all say that the company may contiue business as long they disclose the necessary info in all of the states where this occured. Plus again, at this moment in time, other factors are more telling and more indicative of whether or not the company will succeed. Moreover Bruss and, from the looks of it Vogel, are young men who hopefully have learned from there mistakes. Heck, haven't we almost elected a man who didn't get straight and somber until he was forty? Or, do only Republicans get to atone for their mistakes, and be given second, third, fourth and fifth chances? Anyway, you can use your "dirt" to impugn, but at the same time, for me, it still doesn't have much relevance no matter how many times you argue that it does. Some people will read what you've present and agree. Some won't and will possibly agree with me instead. So it goes. z