Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (120376)	12/4/2000 7:23:41 AM
From: Yaacov	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

I just heard over the CNBC Europe that INTC might warn today!! Have you heard anything? thanks

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (120376)	12/4/2000 9:05:40 AM
From: Scumbria	Respond to of 186894

Ten, Funny, I thought most of your posts regarding Coppermine was its lack of availability or its inability to scale to 1 GHz. I'd sure like to see the few words of praise you heaped on Coppermine. "The low latency L2 on Coppermine gives it a big advantage over Athlon. " Message 11959366 "Desktop benchmark performance is generally limited by memory latency. PIII has a large fast L2 cache which addresses this problem." Message 12447751 "To: Paul Engel who wrote (94893) From: Scumbria Monday, Jan 3, 2000 2:35 PM ET Reply # of 120391 Paul, Sounds like the Intel Coppermine Designers knew EXACTLY what they were doing with the Coppermine design. I suppose the 512K L2 cache Coppermine will be even better ? Yes and yes. Scumbria" Message 12448404 You are correct that I also predicted the 1GHz ceiling which PIII has hit. Is being accurate considered bashing? I know that it is on the Rambus thread. Scumbria