Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: michael97123 who wrote (40388)	12/4/2000 9:20:00 AM
From: daryll40	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 70976

Don't you think if the Dems could have legitimately claimed fraud they would have done so LOUD AND CLEAR and LONG AGO? Doing so now, as a last gasp measure, is hardly credible. Daryll40

To: michael97123 who wrote (40388)	12/4/2000 9:59:09 AM
From: Jerome	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 70976

The charge is true. This case starts on Wednesday. It is separate from what is going on now. In my previous post I said that the Republicans will pay a price for the final victory. One reason is that its starting to dawn on Democrats that, undervotes, bad machines, poor counting and a much higher error rate in Democratic areas cost them the election. The rejected ballots in black areas was 10%. Simply correcting the likelihood of errors will add a lot to the democratic vote. It was also reported that some Republican counties had zero errors (good for them) even after a recount.Whatever they are doing has to be copied in other areas to avoid another situation like the one we are in. In the Seminole county case absentee were allowed to be taken home by Republican volunteers to add in missing data.This is a no no in every state. Jerome

To: michael97123 who wrote (40388)	12/4/2000 10:36:52 AM
From: Srexley	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 70976

The repubs application (NOT BALLOT) was missing the voter identification number (vin) that the printer should have included. The applications came back to the office with no vin, and the supervisor let some repubs add these numbers from the registration books. While it is true that the democrats did not have this opportunity, I BELIEVE it is also true that they did not have the printer error that started the whole mess. I say I believe because I have never heard anyone say they had the same printer problem, and I would assume that they would bring that up. They do bring up that some dem forms piled up in a box, but my guess is that there was something wrong with the applications other a printer error of leaving off what should have been a PRE-PRINTED number on the APPLICATION. Lots of people saying ballot. NOT TRUE.