SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : The Hartcourt Companies, Inc. (HRCT) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Investorman who wrote (1624)12/4/2000 9:10:55 PM
From: StockDung  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2413
 
THE HAYTON GROUP DEFRAUDS NEVADA ENERGY
22. The Hayton Group's scheme to defraud Nevada Energy through
its pattern of racketeering activity was as follows: Golden Chance, one of the
members of the Group, would purport to make the payments due under the
Subscription Agreement and the Note (as described below in Paragraphs 23-25),
thus entitling it to receive substantial amounts of Nevada Energy's Class A
Common Stock. After receiving the stock, Golden Chance
13 14
would sell that stock on the open market, reaping the proceeds for the Group.
However, the scheme contemplated that almost all of the money Golden Chance paid
to Nevada Energy would not be used for proper corporate purposes, instead being
improperly taken from the Company by members of the Hayton Group, principally
Jones, McCloy, Peterson and Mortlake. The net result of this scheme was that the
Hayton Group would actually pay very little money to Nevada Energy, yet be able
to keep the considerable proceeds it obtained from selling the Class A Common
Stock. Because this scheme necessarily would involve the repeated use both of
the United States mails (or private interstate or international carriers) and
interstate and international wire communications, it was reasonably foreseeable
to each defendant that the Hayton Group's scheme to defraud Nevada Energy would
be conducted through a pattern of racketeering activity including violations of
the mail fraud statute, 18 U.S.C. Sec.1341 and wire fraud statute, 18 U.S.C.
Sec.1343.
a. As part of the Hayton Group's scheme to defraud Nevada
Energy, between May and August, 1996, Mr. McCloy, on behalf of Golden Chance,
transferred a total of $1,242,381.40 from accounts controlled by Mr. McCloy's
law firm, Jones, McCloy, Peterson, to the Palm Desert Bank Account, allegedly
pursuant to the Subscription Agreement and Note. As a result of these
"payments," on or before July 22, 1996, Mr. McCloy (who was in Canada) directed
Nevada Energy's board of directors (who were in Australia and the Isle of Man),
by facsimile, to authorize the issuance of 1,242,381 shares of restricted Class
A Common Stock to Golden Chance. On July 22, 1996, the board did so, apparently
meeting via a telephone conference call, and the shares were issued on July 24,
1996. Thereafter, 14 15
Golden Chance, pursuant to the Hayton Group's scheme, sold this stock, with the
proceeds benefitting the Hayton Group.
23. The $1,242,381.40 allegedly used to purchase this stock
was deposited in the Palm Desert Bank Account from the following sources:
a. $10,000 from Maynard M. Britlan on May 17, 1996. Nevada
Energy believes that Mr. Britlan was at the time an associate of Mr. Hayton's.
b. $118,495 from Jones, McCloy, Peterson on May 24, 1996.
c. $528,302.50 from Jones, McCloy, Peterson on May 30, 1996.
d. $123,412.50 from Jones, McCloy, Peterson on June 3, 1996.
e. $108,620 from Jones, McCloy, Peterson on June 6, 1996.
f. $113,557.50 from Jones, McCloy, Peterson on June 17, 1996.
g. $49,394.76 from Jones, McCloy, Peterson on June 27, 1996
h. $88,870 from Jones, McCloy, Peterson on July 2, 1996.
i. $81,453.75 from Jones, McCloy, Peterson on July 12, 1996.
j. $20,275.39 from Jones, McCloy, Peterson on July 15, 1996.
24. Based on sworn statements by Mr. McCloy, all of this
money was sent by wire transfer from Jones, McCloy, Peterson's account at the
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, Commerce Place, Vancouver, British Columbia,
Canada to the Palm Desert Bank Account.
25. Almost all of the money deposited in the Palm Desert Bank
Account was immediately withdrawn from that account (frequently the same day
that it was 15 16
deposited), at either Mr. Hayton's or Mr. McCloy's direction (using either the
telephone or the mail). Specifically, at least the following money, totaling
over one million dollars, was diverted improperly from the Palm Desert Bank
Account in the following manner:
a. May 2, 1996--$50,000 to Jones, McCloy,
Peterson; check number 81;
b. May 2, 1996--$10,000 to Jones, McCloy,
Peterson; check number 82;
c. May 10, 1996--$2,000 to Mortlake; check
number 1006;
d. May 17, 1996--$3,000 to Mortlake; check
number 1014;
e. May 21, 1996--$1,500 to Mortlake; check
number 1016;
f. May 24, 1996--$103,000 to Mortlake; check
number 1021;
g. May 30, 1996--$250,000 to Jones, McCloy,
Peterson; check number 1041;
h. May 30, 1996--$177,000 to Mortlake; check
number 1043;
i. June 3, 1996--$5000 to Kevin Quinn; check
number 1050;
j. June 3, 1996--$50,000 to George O.
Rebensdorf; check number 1051. Nevada Energy
believes that Mr. Rebensdorf is an associate
of Mr. Hayton;
k. June 3, 1996--$10,000 to cash, which
plaintiff believes was taken by Mr. Hayton;
check number 1052;
16 17
l. June 6, 1996--$45,000 to Dean Chamberlain,
to pay a debt of Telecom (AE) Limited and/or
Wina Associates, companies controlled by Mr.
Hayton; check number 1053;
m. June 6, 1996--$50,000 to cash, which
plaintiff believes was taken by Mr. Hayton;
check number 1055;
n. June 17, 1996--$60,000 to Jones, McCloy,
Peterson by wire transfer;
o. June 21, 1996--$25,000 to Pillsbury, Madison
& Sutro to pay an existing debt owed either
by Mr. Hayton personally or by one of his
companies; check number 1068;
p. June 25, 1996--$15,000 to Jones, McCloy,
Peterson by wire transfer;
q. June 26, 1996--$10,000 to Mortlake; check
number 1070;
r. July 1, 1996--$10,000 to Mortlake; check
number 1074;
s. July 2, 1996--$10,000 to Mortlake; check
number 1077;
t. July 3, 1996--$75,000 to Jones, McCloy,
Peterson by wire transfer;
u. July 3, 1996--$10,000 to Mortlake; check
number 1081;
v. July 12, 1996--$40,000 to Mortlake; check
number 1084;
w. July 16, 1996--$10,000 to Mortlake; check
number 1087.
17 18
26. None of this money withdrawn from the Palm Desert Bank
Account was used for proper Nevada Energy purposes but was instead paid,
directly or indirectly, to the Hayton Group.
27. In furtherance of the Hayton Group's scheme to defraud
Nevada Energy, all of the checks set forth in Paragraph 26 a-w were mailed from
Palm Desert California, by the United States mail, the same day as or shortly
after they were dated, to the payees in the United States and Canada. The wire
transfers were sent from the Palm Desert Bank Account to Jones, McCloy,
Peterson's account in Canada on the dates set forth above.
28. This money was obtained from Nevada Energy as part of and
in furtherance of a scheme and artifice to defraud in violation of the mail
fraud statute, 18 U.S.C. Sec.1341 and the wire fraud statute, 18 U.S.C.Sec.1343.
29. The Hayton Group's scheme to defraud Nevada Energy was not
yet completed, however, on October 31, 1996, the board of directors of Nevada
Energy (then consisting of Messrs. Cain and Cannell and Stefan Tevis, who had
replaced Mr. Goold), at the direction of Mr. Hayton and Mr. McCloy (using either
or both the telephone and the mail), voted to amend the Subscription Agreement
to allow Golden Chance to receive immediately the remaining Class A Common Stock
it would have been entitled to receive had it paid the remaining amounts due
under the Note in cash. Through this amendment, however, Golden Chance was
required to pay none of that amount in cash, instead being permitted only to
sign a demand note. However, the Hayton Group (pursuant to its scheme) prevented
such a note from being signed, and Nevada Energy received no further money from
18 19
Golden Chance. Nevertheless, pursuant to the Hayton Group's scheme, Golden
Chance received the following unrestricted Class A Common Stock:
a. 1,061,729 shares on October 1, 1996
b. 2,543,734 shares on November 6, 1996.
30. This stock was sent by mail to Mr. McCloy who, pursuant to
the Hayton Group's scheme, thereafter directed that it be sold to third-party
investors at a substantial profit for the Hayton Group. In furtherance of the
Hayton Group's scheme, Mr. Hayton and Mr. McCloy refused to permit Nevada Energy
to sue Golden Chance for failing to pay for this stock.
31. In addition, following a 1-for-6 reverse split of the
shares of Nevada Energy's Class A Common Stock that apparently occurred
effective January 30, 1997, Mr. Hayton and Mr. McCloy, acting pursuant to the
Hayton Group's scheme, instructed the Nevada Energy board to issue the following
post-split shares to the following persons or entities:
a. 220,000 shares (or 1,320,000 pre-split) on
February 3, 1997 to Jones McCloy Peterson to
pay for attorneys' fees incurred by Golden
Chance;
b. 100,000 shares (or 600,000 pre-split) on
February 3, 1997 to the law firm of
Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman &
Dicker for legal work done of behalf of
either Mr. Hayton or a company controlled
by Mr. Hayton;
19 20
c. 300,000 shares (or 1,800,000 pre-split) on
February 3, 1997 to Mortlake;
d. 300,000 shares (or 1,800,000 pre-split) on
February 11, 1997 to Pacific International
Securities for the benefit of Golden Chance;
e. 50,000 shares (or 300,000 pre-split) on
February 18, 1997 to Pacific Rim Capital, a
company owned and controlled by Mr. Hayton;
f. 100,000 shares (or 600,000 pre-split) on
February 18, 1997 to The Hartcourt
February 18, 1997 to The Hartcourt
Companies, another company owned and
controlled by Mr. Hayton;
32. Nevada Energy received no consideration for the issuance
of any of this stock.
33. This stock was obtained from Nevada Energy as part of and
in furtherance of a scheme and artifice to defraud in violation of the mail
fraud statute, 18 U.S.C. Sec.1341, and the wire fraud statute, 18 U.S.C.
Sec.1343.

THE HAYTON GROUP DEFRAUDS NEVADA ENERGY
22. The Hayton Group's scheme to defraud Nevada Energy through
its pattern of racketeering activity was as follows: Golden Chance, one of the
members of the Group, would purport to make the payments due under the
Subscription Agreement and the Note (as described below in Paragraphs 23-25),
thus entitling it to receive substantial amounts of Nevada Energy's Class A
Common Stock. After receiving the stock, Golden Chance
13 14
would sell that stock on the open market, reaping the proceeds for the Group.
However, the scheme contemplated that almost all of the money Golden Chance paid
to Nevada Energy would not be used for proper corporate purposes, instead being
improperly taken from the Company by members of the Hayton Group, principally
Jones, McCloy, Peterson and Mortlake. The net result of this scheme was that the
Hayton Group would actually pay very little money to Nevada Energy, yet be able
to keep the considerable proceeds it obtained from selling the Class A Common
Stock. Because this scheme necessarily would involve the repeated use both of
the United States mails (or private interstate or international carriers) and
interstate and international wire communications, it was reasonably foreseeable
to each defendant that the Hayton Group's scheme to defraud Nevada Energy would
be conducted through a pattern of racketeering activity including violations of
the mail fraud statute, 18 U.S.C. Sec.1341 and wire fraud statute, 18 U.S.C.
Sec.1343.
a. As part of the Hayton Group's scheme to defraud Nevada
Energy, between May and August, 1996, Mr. McCloy, on behalf of Golden Chance,
transferred a total of $1,242,381.40 from accounts controlled by Mr. McCloy's
law firm, Jones, McCloy, Peterson, to the Palm Desert Bank Account, allegedly
pursuant to the Subscription Agreement and Note. As a result of these
"payments," on or before July 22, 1996, Mr. McCloy (who was in Canada) directed
Nevada Energy's board of directors (who were in Australia and the Isle of Man),
by facsimile, to authorize the issuance of 1,242,381 shares of restricted Class
A Common Stock to Golden Chance. On July 22, 1996, the board did so, apparently
meeting via a telephone conference call, and the shares were issued on July 24,
1996. Thereafter, 14 15
Golden Chance, pursuant to the Hayton Group's scheme, sold this stock, with the
proceeds benefitting the Hayton Group.
23. The $1,242,381.40 allegedly used to purchase this stock
was deposited in the Palm Desert Bank Account from the following sources:
a. $10,000 from Maynard M. Britlan on May 17, 1996. Nevada
Energy believes that Mr. Britlan was at the time an associate of Mr. Hayton's.
b. $118,495 from Jones, McCloy, Peterson on May 24, 1996.
c. $528,302.50 from Jones, McCloy, Peterson on May 30, 1996.
d. $123,412.50 from Jones, McCloy, Peterson on June 3, 1996.
e. $108,620 from Jones, McCloy, Peterson on June 6, 1996.
f. $113,557.50 from Jones, McCloy, Peterson on June 17, 1996.
g. $49,394.76 from Jones, McCloy, Peterson on June 27, 1996
h. $88,870 from Jones, McCloy, Peterson on July 2, 1996.
i. $81,453.75 from Jones, McCloy, Peterson on July 12, 1996.
j. $20,275.39 from Jones, McCloy, Peterson on July 15, 1996.
24. Based on sworn statements by Mr. McCloy, all of this
money was sent by wire transfer from Jones, McCloy, Peterson's account at the
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, Commerce Place, Vancouver, British Columbia,
Canada to the Palm Desert Bank Account.
25. Almost all of the money deposited in the Palm Desert Bank
Account was immediately withdrawn from that account (frequently the same day
that it was 15 16
deposited), at either Mr. Hayton's or Mr. McCloy's direction (using either the
telephone or the mail). Specifically, at least the following money, totaling
over one million dollars, was diverted improperly from the Palm Desert Bank
Account in the following manner:
a. May 2, 1996--$50,000 to Jones, McCloy,
Peterson; check number 81;
b. May 2, 1996--$10,000 to Jones, McCloy,
Peterson; check number 82;
c. May 10, 1996--$2,000 to Mortlake; check
number 1006;
d. May 17, 1996--$3,000 to Mortlake; check
number 1014;
e. May 21, 1996--$1,500 to Mortlake; check
number 1016;
f. May 24, 1996--$103,000 to Mortlake; check
number 1021;
g. May 30, 1996--$250,000 to Jones, McCloy,
Peterson; check number 1041;
h. May 30, 1996--$177,000 to Mortlake; check
number 1043;
i. June 3, 1996--$5000 to Kevin Quinn; check
number 1050;
j. June 3, 1996--$50,000 to George O.
Rebensdorf; check number 1051. Nevada Energy
believes that Mr. Rebensdorf is an associate
of Mr. Hayton;
k. June 3, 1996--$10,000 to cash, which
plaintiff believes was taken by Mr. Hayton;
check number 1052;
16 17
l. June 6, 1996--$45,000 to Dean Chamberlain,
to pay a debt of Telecom (AE) Limited and/or
Wina Associates, companies controlled by Mr.
Hayton; check number 1053;
m. June 6, 1996--$50,000 to cash, which
plaintiff believes was taken by Mr. Hayton;
check number 1055;
n. June 17, 1996--$60,000 to Jones, McCloy,
Peterson by wire transfer;
o. June 21, 1996--$25,000 to Pillsbury, Madison
& Sutro to pay an existing debt owed either
by Mr. Hayton personally or by one of his
companies; check number 1068;
p. June 25, 1996--$15,000 to Jones, McCloy,
Peterson by wire transfer;
q. June 26, 1996--$10,000 to Mortlake; check
number 1070;
r. July 1, 1996--$10,000 to Mortlake; check
number 1074;
s. July 2, 1996--$10,000 to Mortlake; check
number 1077;
t. July 3, 1996--$75,000 to Jones, McCloy,
Peterson by wire transfer;
u. July 3, 1996--$10,000 to Mortlake; check
number 1081;
v. July 12, 1996--$40,000 to Mortlake; check
number 1084;
w. July 16, 1996--$10,000 to Mortlake; check
number 1087.
17 18
26. None of this money withdrawn from the Palm Desert Bank
Account was used for proper Nevada Energy purposes but was instead paid,
directly or indirectly, to the Hayton Group.
27. In furtherance of the Hayton Group's scheme to defraud
Nevada Energy, all of the checks set forth in Paragraph 26 a-w were mailed from
Palm Desert California, by the United States mail, the same day as or shortly
after they were dated, to the payees in the United States and Canada. The wire
transfers were sent from the Palm Desert Bank Account to Jones, McCloy,
Peterson's account in Canada on the dates set forth above.
28. This money was obtained from Nevada Energy as part of and
in furtherance of a scheme and artifice to defraud in violation of the mail
fraud statute, 18 U.S.C. Sec.1341 and the wire fraud statute, 18 U.S.C.Sec.1343.
29. The Hayton Group's scheme to defraud Nevada Energy was not
yet completed, however, on October 31, 1996, the board of directors of Nevada
Energy (then consisting of Messrs. Cain and Cannell and Stefan Tevis, who had
replaced Mr. Goold), at the direction of Mr. Hayton and Mr. McCloy (using either
or both the telephone and the mail), voted to amend the Subscription Agreement
to allow Golden Chance to receive immediately the remaining Class A Common Stock
it would have been entitled to receive had it paid the remaining amounts due
under the Note in cash. Through this amendment, however, Golden Chance was
required to pay none of that amount in cash, instead being permitted only to
sign a demand note. However, the Hayton Group (pursuant to its scheme) prevented
such a note from being signed, and Nevada Energy received no further money from
18 19
Golden Chance. Nevertheless, pursuant to the Hayton Group's scheme, Golden
Chance received the following unrestricted Class A Common Stock:
a. 1,061,729 shares on October 1, 1996
b. 2,543,734 shares on November 6, 1996.
30. This stock was sent by mail to Mr. McCloy who, pursuant to
the Hayton Group's scheme, thereafter directed that it be sold to third-party
investors at a substantial profit for the Hayton Group. In furtherance of the
Hayton Group's scheme, Mr. Hayton and Mr. McCloy refused to permit Nevada Energy
to sue Golden Chance for failing to pay for this stock.
31. In addition, following a 1-for-6 reverse split of the
shares of Nevada Energy's Class A Common Stock that apparently occurred
effective January 30, 1997, Mr. Hayton and Mr. McCloy, acting pursuant to the
Hayton Group's scheme, instructed the Nevada Energy board to issue the following
post-split shares to the following persons or entities:
a. 220,000 shares (or 1,320,000 pre-split) on
February 3, 1997 to Jones McCloy Peterson to
pay for attorneys' fees incurred by Golden
Chance;
b. 100,000 shares (or 600,000 pre-split) on
February 3, 1997 to the law firm of
Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman &
Dicker for legal work done of behalf of
either Mr. Hayton or a company controlled
by Mr. Hayton;
19 20
c. 300,000 shares (or 1,800,000 pre-split) on
February 3, 1997 to Mortlake;
d. 300,000 shares (or 1,800,000 pre-split) on
February 11, 1997 to Pacific International
Securities for the benefit of Golden Chance;
e. 50,000 shares (or 300,000 pre-split) on
February 18, 1997 to Pacific Rim Capital, a
company owned and controlled by Mr. Hayton;
f. 100,000 shares (or 600,000 pre-split) on
February 18, 1997 to The Hartcourt
February 18, 1997 to The Hartcourt
Companies, another company owned and
controlled by Mr. Hayton;
32. Nevada Energy received no consideration for the issuance
of any of this stock.
33. This stock was obtained from Nevada Energy as part of and
in furtherance of a scheme and artifice to defraud in violation of the mail
fraud statute, 18 U.S.C. Sec.1341, and the wire fraud statute, 18 U.S.C.
Sec.1343.



To: Investorman who wrote (1624)12/4/2000 9:12:11 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 2413
 
CHEERS CHUMPS!!==>STARUNI CORP filed this 8-K on 11/29/2000.

11. Indemnification Procedures
A. Pego Systems, Inc. presently is in debt to Comerica Bank for
approximately $950,000. Said sum has been guaranteed by Enova and The
Hartcourt Companies (OTCBB "HRCT") There is a present litigation in
the matter with Comercica Bank suing both Pego and)@MCT. Both
Hartcourt and Enova agree to remain as guarantors of such debt (until
and unless any court of competent jurisdiction shall rule otherwise)
and shall hold SRUN harmless for any and all costs incidental to this
matter. However, Pego owns 200000 shares of Hancourt, which, if Pego
is compelled to pay Comerica, may only be used to diminish that
debt,for that purpose and no other.
B. If any other claim is made by a party wlich would give rise to a right
of indemnification under this paragraph, the party seeking
indemnification (Indemnified Party) will promptly cause notice thereof
to be delivered to the parry from whom is sought (Indemnifying Party)
The Indemnified Party will permit the Indemnifying Party to assume the
defense of any such claim or any litigation resulting from the claims.
Counsel for the Indemnifying Party which will conduct the defense must
be approved by the Indemnified Party (whose approval will not be
unreasonable withheld), and the Indemnified Party may participate in
such defense at the expense of the Indemnified Party. The indemnifying
Party will not in the defense of any such claim or litigation, consent
to entry of any judgment or enter into any settlement without the
written consent of the Indemnified Party (which consent will not be
unreasonably withheld), The Indemnified Party will not,in connection
with any such claim or litigatiorn, consent to entry of any judgment
or enter into any settlement without the written consent of the
Indemnifying Party (which consent will not be unreasonable withheld),
The Indemnified Party will cooperate fully with the Indemnifying Party
and make available to the Indemnifying Party all pertinent information
under its control relating to any such claim or litigation. If the
Indemnifying Party refuses or fails to conduct the defense as required
in this Section, then the Indemnified Party may conduct such defense
at the expense of the Indemnifying Party and the approval of the
Indemnifying Party will not be required for any settlement or consent
or entry of judgment,
12. Changes in Management of SRUN. The Board of Directors of SRUN presently
consists of three perqons. As a result of this transaction, Frederic Colm,
Chairman of Enova, shall be added to the Board of SRUN. He shall also
become an officer of SRUN. Both Harcourt and Enova agree to this management
and Board structure of SRUN for a period of at least two years from the
date of this agreement, unless all parties and signatories to this
agreement mutually agree to a change.
13. Costs and Expenses. Enova andSRUN shall bear their own costs and expenses
in the proposed exchange and transfer described in this Agreement, Enova
and SRUN have been
represented by their own attorney in this transaction, and shall pay the
fees of its, attorney, except as may be expressly set forth herein to
the contrary,
14. Notices. Any notice under this Agreement shall be deemed to have been
sufficiently given if sent by registered or certified mail, postage
prepaid, addressed as follows:
To Enova: Enova I-Ioldings, Inc,
9800 South Sepulveda Boulevard, Suite 818
Los Angeles California 90045
Telephone: (310) 410-7290
Telefax: (310) 410-7297
Attn: Frederic Cohn, Chairman
To SRUN: Staruni Corporation
1642 Westwood Boulevard, Suite 201
Los Angeles, Califorr@a 90024
Telephone: (310) 470-9358
Telefax: (310) 470-9127
Attn: Bruce Stuart,President
15. Miscellaneous, ----------------
A. Further Assurances. At any time and from time to titne, after the
effective date, each party will execute such additional instruments
and take such as may be reasonably requested by the other party to
confirm or perfect title to any property transferred hereunder or
otherwise to carry out the intent and purposes of this Agreement.
B. Waiver. Any failure on the part of any party hereto to comply with any
of its obligations, agreements, or conditions hereunder may be waived
in writing by the party to whom such compliance is owed.
C. Headings. The section and subsection headings in this Agreement are
inserted for convenience only and shall not affect in any way the
meaning or interpretation of this Agreement.
D. Counterparts. This Agreement may be Executed simultaneously in two or
more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all
of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.

E. Governing Law. This Agreement was negotiated and is being contracted
for in the State of California, and shall be governed by the laws of
the State of California, notwithstanding any conflict-of-law provision
to the contrary. Any suit, action or legal proceeding arising from or
related to this Agreement shall be submitted for binding arbitration
resolution to the fudicial Arbitration and Mediation Services in Los
Angeles, Ca., pursuant to their Rules of Procedure or any other
mutually agreed upon arbitrator. The parties agree to abide by
decisions rendered as final and binding, and each party irrevocably
and unconditionally consents to the jurisdiction of such Courts in
such suit, action or legal proceeding and waives any objection to the
laying of venue in, or the juiisdicfion of said Courts.
F. Binding Effect. This Agreement shall be binding upon the parties
hereto and inure to the benefit of the parties their respective heirs,
administrators, executors, successors, and assigns.
G. Severability. If any part of this Agreement is deemed to be
unenforceable the balance of the Agreement she remain in full force
and effect.
IN WITNESS WBEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement the day and above
written.
Enova Holdings, Inc.
By:
/s/ Frederic Cohn
------------------
Frederic Cohn, Chairman
Staruni Corporation
By:
/s/ Bruce D. Stuart
-------------------
Bruce Stuart, President

tenkwizard.com



To: Investorman who wrote (1624)12/4/2000 9:50:25 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 2413
 
Reverse Mergers: Playing the Shell Game

A common nontraditional public offering is the two-step reverse merger. The first step is to identify a likely public shell company. Shell companies often have a sordid past (bankruptcy, for example) and are in businesses unrelated to that of the company desiring to go public. Sometimes they even come with shareholder litigation. The second step of the process is to merge the private company into the shell company.

Usually, shell companies have a token amount of cash, and the investment banker who proposed the transaction promises to raise additional capital after the merger. Sometimes this capital materializes. Any investment banker who suggests a reverse merger, however, should be suspect. Reputable bankers do not promote the use of reverse mergers, and the SEC frowns upon them.

Limited Capital Access. Companies that use reverse mergers to become public have limited access to capital. The promoters of these schemes generally can raise a few million dollars. However, little capital is left for the company after the fees are paid and the promoter is gone. To attract investors in the public markets, companies need to have numerous market makers who provide the liquidity for trading the company's stock. Typically, reverse-merger shells have no more than one or two market makers.

Once the company is public, the universe of institutional investors is limited. Most VC investors are prohibited from investing in public companies. Also, these companies usually are traded in an over-the-counter market, such as the "Bulletin Board" or "Pink Sheets," that has limited liquidity for investors. Stock prices on these markets are thus usually below $5 per share. Most institutional investors are prohibited from investing in stocks priced below that figure. It is also worth noting that the limited liquidity inherent in reverse mergers makes it virtually impossible for company managers to sell stock.

New Responsibilities. The reverse merger brings a company all the disadvantages of being public without the benefit of access to capital. Public companies face costly reporting and administrative requirements. Also, managers of public companies have to respond to inquiries from disgruntled shareholders. These shareholders may have lost money on their investment. Sometimes they purchased the stock on the basis of false representations by brokers. Even though its management was not involved in the stock sale, the shareholders may still hold the company responsible. Litigation could result.

Death Spiral. Most reverse mergers also unnecessarily create complicated capital structures for companies, sometimes called death spirals. Such a capital structure includes numerous classes of convertible preferred stock and warrants. The dilution to common shareholders of these classes of stock and warrants—the overhang—is extreme. A company with 1 million common shares outstanding may have an overhang of 50 million shares. These structures are called death spirals because the companies are diluting shareholders faster than they are growing. Needless to say, investors shy away from these companies.

devicelink.com



To: Investorman who wrote (1624)12/5/2000 4:40:21 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 2413
 
CHEERS CHUMPS!!->WORLDCALL CORP filed this 8-K on 01/15/1999. tenkwizard.com

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA

POWERTEL USA, INC., ) CV-N-98-00739-HDM (PHA)
a Delaware corporation, formerly )
Nevada Energy Company, Inc., )
)
Plaintiff, )
)
v. ) COMPLAINT
) ---------
PATTINSON HAYTON; RODERICK )
R. MCCLOY, individually and trading as )
RODERICK R. MCCLOY, P.C. and )
JONES, MCCLOY, PETERSON, )
affiliated law practices; JONES, MCCLOY )
PETERSON, affiliated law practices; )
KEVIN QUINN; GOLDEN CHANCE )
LIMITED, an Isle of Man Private Company )
Limited by Shares; WATERFORD TRUST )
COMPANY, an Irish corporation; and )
MORTLAKE VENTURE CAPITAL )
FUND, a California corporation, )
)
Defendants. )

1
2

A. JURISDICTION AND VENUE
----------------------

1. Plaintiff PowerTel USA, Inc., formerly known as Nevada
Energy Company, Inc. ("Nevada Energy"), brings this action pursuant to the
Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act ("RICO"), 18 U.S.C.
Sec. Sec. 1961-1968, and common law conversion and fraud.

2. Jurisdiction over the RICO claims exists pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Sec. 1964 and 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1331, in that this is a civil action arising
under the laws of the United States. This Court has supplemental jurisdiction
over the related state-law claims.

3. Venue exists in this district pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
Sec. 1391(b), in that a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim
occurred in this district.

B. NATURE OF THE ACTION
--------------------

4. This lawsuit arises out of a pattern of racketeering
activity and scheme to defraud pursued by the Hayton Enterprise Group (the
"Hayton Group" or the "Group"), an association-in-fact that was formed to
conduct illegal activity. The affairs of the Hayton Group were and are directed
by defendant Pattinson Hayton. The Hayton Group consists of at least all of the
defendants in this action, plus other individuals and entities not being sued
here, and may include other individuals and entities unknown to plaintiff. Each
of the members of the Hayton Group were knowing participants in the Group's
pattern of racketeering activity and scheme to defraud Nevada Energy, as
explained below. The Hayton Enterprise Group's activities affected interstate
and foreign commerce.

2
3

5. The Hayton Group's scheme involves taking over small
publicly-traded companies, illegally looting them for the Group's substantial
profit, and then leaving that company on the verge of, or in, bankruptcy. The
Hayton Group accomplishes its scheme by initially appearing to be a legitimate
investor interested in providing financial assistance to the target company
through one or more companies that are members of the Group. Although Mr. Hayton
through one or more companies that are members of the Group. Although Mr. Hayton
controls the Group, he typically stays in the background once the takeover is
complete. Instead, the Hayton Group conducts its day-to-day operations through
other members of the Group, particularly attorneys. In addition to keeping Mr.
Hayton out of the public view, the Hayton Group's use of attorneys gives the
target company a false sense of security, as it provides comfort that the Hayton
target company a false sense of security, as it provides comfort that the Hayton
Group's investment must be legitimate. Unbeknownst to the company, however, the
attorneys (who sometimes, as in the case here of defendant Kevin Quinn, have
prior disciplinary problems) are a knowing part of the illegal scheme. Indeed,
instead of guarding against the defrauding of the company, the attorneys (as
here with Roderick McCloy and his law firms) are one of the chief means by which
the Hayton Group manages to defraud the target company.

6. The Hayton Group's first victims apparently were Apogee
Robotics Inc. and Quadrax Corp. (of which more below). Thereafter, the Hayton
Robotics Inc. and Quadrax Corp. (of which more below). Thereafter, the Hayton
Group descended on Nevada Energy, as described in detail below. The Hayton Group
(including additional individuals and entities) is currently using this same
scheme to loot Zulu-Tek, formerly known as Netmaster Group (of which more
below).

C. THE PARTIES
-----------

3
4

7. Plaintiff PowerTel USA, Inc, is a Delaware corporation. It
is a diversified holding company engaged in the energy and telecommunications
industries; its current principal place of business is East Lansing, Michigan.
At most times relevant to this complaint, PowerTel was known as Nevada Energy
Company, Inc., and had its principal place of business in Reno, Nevada. At all
times relevant to this complaint, Nevada Energy and PowerTel were engaged in
interstate commerce. Plaintiff will be referred to as "Nevada Energy" or "the
Company" throughout this complaint.

8. THE MEMBERS OF THE HAYTON ENTERPRISE GROUP
------------------------------------------

The members of the Hayton Enterprise Group include at least
the following defendants, all of whom agreed to participate, and did
participate, in the Group's racketeering activity by means of a scheme to
defraud Nevada Energy:

a. PATTINSON HAYTON, an Australian national
who currently lives in or around Palm Springs, California; he sometimes adds a
"III" after his name and at other times has used the name "Patrick Hayton". Mr.
Hayton is and has been the leader of the Hayton Group throughout the unlawful
scheme set forth in this complaint. Mr. Hayton purportedly was elected as Vice
President of Financial Planning of Nevada Energy on November 25, 1996 and as
"Interim President" of Nevada Energy on approximately February 10, 1997,
although he purported to act as President starting sometime in January 1997. Mr.
Hayton's unsavory career is set forth in more detail in Paragraph 9.

b. RODERICK R. MCCLOY, a barrister and
solicitor in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada who trades variously as
Roderick R. McCloy, P.C. and Jones,

4
5

McCloy, Peterson, affiliated law practices. On information and belief, Mr.
McCloy has been a participant in the Hayton Group's activities since its
successful scheme to defraud Apogee Robotics, Inc. and Quadrax Corp. Mr. McCloy
was prominently involved in the Hayton Group's scheme to defraud Nevada Energy,
as he passed the Hayton Group's orders to Nevada Energy's board of directors,
gave the Nevada Energy board securities and corporate legal advice (even though
he is not licensed to practice law in any state of the United States), and used
Jones, McCloy, Peterson's accounts as a conduit to improperly take money from
Nevada Energy for the benefit of the Hayton Group. In addition, Mr. McCloy was
and is a director of defendant Waterford Trust Company, another member of the
Hayton Group.

c. JONES, MCCLOY, PETERSON, affiliated law practices, a law firm
based in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Acting through Mr. McCloy, Jones,
McCloy, Peterson knowingly was one of the principal conduits through which the
Hayton Group defrauded Nevada Energy, as it knowingly permitted its bank
accounts to be used to transfer money into and improperly take money out of the
Company. In participating in this illegal activity, plaintiff believes that
Jones, McCloy, Peterson made a substantial profit. In all of his activities set
forth below, Mr. McCloy acted both on his own behalf and as an agent of Jones,
McCloy, Peterson.

d. KEVIN QUINN, a disbarred attorney and convicted felon who
formerly was admitted to practice law in the state of California. Although
knowing that Mr. Quinn had been disbarred and convicted of grand theft
embezzlement for stealing money from clients, the Hayton Group caused him to be
hired as counsel by Nevada Energy, believing

5
6

(correctly) that Mr. Quinn would knowingly participate in the Group's scheme to
defraud the Company. In addition, at the direction of Mr. Hayton, Mr. Quinn
purportedly was elected as Secretary and General Counsel of Nevada Energy on
approximately January 21, 1997. While purporting to act as Nevada Energy's
counsel (even though he knew that he had been suspended from the practice of
law), Mr. Quinn fraudulently caused Nevada Energy to file documents with the
Securities and Exchange Commission that he knew to be false and misleading.

e. GOLDEN CHANCE LIMITED, an Isle of Man private
company limited by shares, which was the Hayton Group's chosen instrument to
obtain effective control of Nevada Energy. Although Mr. Hayton was neither a
director, officer nor record stockholder of Golden Chance, Nevada Energy
believes that he was (and is) its controlling stockholder, hiding his ownership
through a web of nominee companies and individuals.

f. WATERFORD TRUST COMPANY, an Irish corporation.
Waterford participated in the effective control of Nevada Energy through its
affiliate, Golden Chance. Although Mr. Hayton was neither a director, officer
nor record stockholder of Waterford, Nevada Energy believes that he also was
(and is) its controlling stockholder, hiding his ownership through a web of
nominee companies and individuals. At all relevant times, Golden Chance acted as
an agent for Waterford.

g. MORTLAKE VENTURE CAPITAL FUND, a California
company that Nevada Energy believes is solely owned by Mr. Hayton. Through Mr.
Hayton, Mortlake

6
7
participated in the effective control of Nevada Energy, and was
used by the Hayton Group as one of the principle conduits by which the Group
defrauded Nevada Energy.

D. MR. HAYTON'S HISTORY BEFORE FORMING THE HAYTON GROUP
----------------------------------------------------

9. Mr. Hayton has a long history of problems with agencies and
courts. Among other matters:

a. In approximately 1987, a company controlled by Mr.
Hayton, Palmer Financial Corp., bought a controlling interest in a United
Kingdom investment firm, London & Norwich, that was later ordered into
receivership by British authorities for failing to protect the public money it
was entrusted with investing;

b. In approximately 1988, Mr. Hayton was fined
$60,000 by the United States District Court for the District of Columbia for
failing to comply with a court order requiring two companies he controlled,
Palmer Financial Corp. and Galloway Capital Corp., to file certain financial
reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission;

c. In 1991, the Immigration and Naturalization
Service issued a deportation order for Mr. Hayton, who avoided deportation by
marrying a United States citizen;

d. In 1992, the California Superintendent of Banks,
in blocking Mr. Hayton's purchase of a unit of the Bank of Beverly Hills,
stated that Mr. Hayton's "integrity. . . is subject to question."

E. THE HAYTON GROUP INITIATES ITS PATTERN OF RACKETEERING
-- ------------------------------------------------------
ACTIVITY
- --------


7
8

10. Prior to becoming involved with Nevada Energy, the Hayton
10. Prior to becoming involved with Nevada Energy, the Hayton
Group obtained control of two other small, publicly-traded companies, Apogee and
Quadrax, both in mid-1994. In both of those cases, the Hayton Group obtained
substantial sums of money (perhaps as much as millions of dollars) from either
the company or its investors, while leaving both companies in or on the verge of
bankruptcy, and the investors with worthless (or near-worthless) stock.

11. For example, the Hayton Group acquired control of Apogee
on approximately May 12, 1994 by purchasing 6 million shares of its common stock
for 6 million shares of preferred stock in Conagher & Co., Inc., which was then
(and may still be) a member of the Hayton Group. Conagher was required to redeem
its preferred stock for $2 million, but never did so; as the Hayton Group
controlled Apogee's board of directors, it was able to prevent Apogee from
pursuing its legal rights against Conagher. Although it never properly paid for
its Apogee stock, Conagher nonetheless sold it, earning large profits for the
Hayton Group. As a result of the Hayton Group's actions, Apogee's stockholders
suffered large losses, as the price of Apogee's stock dropped from 75 cents to 2
cents per share. Apogee had its stock delisted by NASDAQ on approximately
November 1, 1994, suspended operations on November 28, 1994 and filed for
bankruptcy protection on December 9, 1994.

12. As a result of this looting, Apogee filed an adversary
proceeding against Mr. Hayton in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Colorado. On April 8, 1997, after Mr. Hayton failed to defend the
action against him, that court entered a judgment against Mr. Hayton for nearly
$3.7 million, including $1 million in punitive

8
9

damages. In this order, the Bankruptcy Court determined that Conagher was the
"alter ego of and instrumentality of [Mr.] Hayton," that Mr. Hayton "received
from [Apogee] transfers of stock of Apogee Robotics for less than fair
consideration," that Mr. Hayton received payments from Apogee "without corporate
authorization [which] represented conversion of funds of Apogee," and that Mr.
Hayton made false representations and assurances to Apogee. In awarding punitive
damages, the Bankruptcy Court determined that "the actions of [Mr.] Hayton were
calculated and intentional and intended to defraud Apogee and the shareholders
of Apogee and represented a gross fraud upon Apogee and its shareholders."

13. Also as a result of his actions with Apogee, Mr. Hayton
and Conagher were sued by James R. Currier, Sr., a former officer of Apogee, in
the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina. Mr.
Hayton also defaulted in that action, and on September 26, 1996 Mr. Currier
obtained a judgment against both defendants for over $775,000. This court also
determined that Conagher was the alter ego of Mr. Hayton.

14. With Quadrax, the Hayton Group acquired control by having
Conagher buy substantial amounts of Quadrax's stock for promissory notes, which
were never fully paid. During the Hayton Group's control of Quadrax, Mr. Hayton
used more than $1 million in company funds to write checks to his wife,
attorneys who did not work for Quadrax, other companies controlled by the Hayton
attorneys who did not work for Quadrax, other companies controlled by the Hayton
Group (including Apogee) and for undocumented "travel expenses." Mr. Hayton's
tenure resulted in losses of nearly $8 million for Quadrax's stockholders. After
Mr. Hayton quit as chairman in early 1995, the new management claimed that Mr.
Hayton was the main reason for these losses, stating that he "directed
substantial

9
10

resources away from the company's core business and into activities
that the current management was either unaware of or did not endorse." Quadrax
also later filed for bankruptcy protection.



To: Investorman who wrote (1624)12/5/2000 8:44:59 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 2413
 
UPDATED CHUMP LIST 12/5/00

1.EastWind_1 ... Vienna, Virginia.....Long/10/1997
2. CABRALEES.....CONNECTICUT..............LONG 1997
3. hansro...........NH.......................long/97
4. thejetman......Oklahoma............long/Mar 1998
5. Egl1Andy.......Tennessee..........LONG!!!7/10/98
6. solon13...Miami Lakes-Florida..Long .....July 98
7. MMayr...........Tennessee............long ~ 7/98
8. 3000Trader....Munich...................Long 8/98
9. TENNISSTUD......FLORIDA..................Long/98
10. TWEEDLEDEE......FLORIDA...................LONG/98
12. joespringer...Indiana............very long 7/7/98
13. nisj .......Sweden.....................long..1998
14. JFloyd ... Iowa City, IA .............. Long 2/99
15. fantastic57....So. IL....Long ...............3/99
16. BillBlake....Texas Coast Long............... 3/99
17......Fingshui88.....long...Toronto............3/99
18. Jointhefun .......Long Island, NY .... long 03/99
19. anne............germany................long/03/99
20...BoatRgirl.....Florida.................LONG..6/99
21. Lucky5ive.......Santa Rosa,Cal.........long..7/99
22. marshell..........Maryland...................7/99
23. DA!..........................................7/99
24. UndfinRich .Hamilton,N.J..strong and focused 7\99
25. Mochajet........Reston, Virginia.......long..7/99
26. fd47.........new york...................Long 7/99
27. Holybull........Whitestone,N.Y....long..July 1999
28. Rosetta.......Texas...................long.. 8/99
29. rrr3725s...Illinois....................long 08/99
30. ezcomngo...Michigan.....................long 8/99
31. ScrapFe.........Walworth N.Y...........long..8/99
32. SINCERELY2......Tennessee..........long..Aug 1999
34. MBDog .......... New Jersey ........ Long .. 8/99
35. Ihateshorts.....Connecticut............long..9/99
36. uis_aol_money......Philadelphia......Long....9/99
37. hrctwow..........germany...............long..9/99
38. MisterEC.....California.................Long 9/99
39. Cinimond...California..................long 10/99
40. jhw.......Florida......................Long 10/99
41. atcjerrylee..Texas.....................long 10/99
42 bluemarlin portugal..........................10/99
43. dagoduck.....Germany, HH,.... .........long 10/99
44. Daddycool100...../././N.Idaho././..Long..OCT 1999
45. dcjmhaze...............................Long 10/99
46. Kaisersozze........Silver Springs, MD..Long 10/99
47. TPrinz........Germany Long .................10/99
48. MRHRCT, N.D. long ..........................10/99
49. Terah............Washington..............Oct 1999
50. TFN.............New Jersey..............Long11/99
51. fishter.........upstate NY...............nov 1999
52. TIN-Berrygood.....Hawaii...............Long/11/99
53. THBRN.............New Mexico...........long 11/99
54. 500_and_Long (David).Massachusetts.....Long 11/99
(In so deep, I have to have sunlight mailed in!)
55. BELESPRIT.......Germany...............Long..11/99
56. Shawniebean...Massachuetts...........long 11/1999
57. Minddoc7...Long Island, NY.............Long 11/99
58. SleekSub... Windsor, Ca................Long 11/99
59. JhnR........N. Conway, NH..........long.....12/99
60. gymbag1252....New Jersey...............Long 12/99
61. J_A_P1649.......FLORIDA...................Long/99
62. Shivas ...........Oregon................LONG 1999
63. ROZENBOB......PENSACOLA,FLORIDA.........LONG 1/00
64. jmap-------Erie,Pa.,....................Long 2/00
65. custom880....Minneapolis................long 3/00
66. acgamblers.....NJ/FL....................Long 3/00
67. vdubking....Massachusettes............long 4/2000
68. tekon........North Carolina...........Long 5/2000
69. millionseeker...Maine/Bangkok........long 09/2000
70. BIZTRO..........NC......long...unknown
71. goldengate...San Fran?..Long
72. Hunter-1 ....Tennessee ...long...?
73. MrBankRoll..Washington..As long as it takes.
74. ezlivn24 ................... Long 1998
75. Cerber4.....Newark DE.....Long 8/99
76. Surshot....Long 11/99
77. Jsdsi2.....Texas....Long 11/99
78. RichandReck......Kentucky.....Long 7/99
79. Moreb45.....Missouri....Long 7/99
80. Implantdoc....california...long 11/99
81. oasishawaii....Long Island N.Y....8/99
82. Denche3............Long 11/99
83. Thacom.............Long 11/99
84. gustavgans ......Germany, HH, ..long 07/99
85. borrink..........Germany, MUC, since 08/99
86. kiel...Germany....long and strong..middle12/99
87. TickerNova.....Massachusetts....long 05/00
88. golfbcw ......Va Beach,Va .....long 01/00
89. 68_shovel...... anywhere USA..... 6/99
90. Betty Ann.......New York.........7/99
91. Denarius........CA...............11/99
92. wolfdad133....Mukwaungo, WI......11/99
93. Hennes.........Long 11/99
94. dabay.............Texas......Long 4/99
95. nordmic.......Calif.....Long 3/99
96. VETTEGUY1......Brighton, MI... Long 12/99
97. drivera........Texas...........Long 11/99
98. ketzer.........Lucerne, Switzerland....Long 11/99
99. asela..........SJ, CA..........Long 6/99
100. davidvwright..................Long 9/00
101. CJP01......Fort Lee, NJ.......Long 4/99
102. Oyou812....Penna..............Long 1/00
103. Prezesbc...Queens, NY.........Long 5/99
104. JABABELL......FLORIDA.........LONG...12/4
105..SHADOW WALKER........LONG.......LATE (97)
106. Scottchu......Long 3/99
107. PurpleBears......Wisconsin....Long 11/99
108. Jessi_garron...NW Arakansas........ 5/99