SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: PartyTime who wrote (100045)12/4/2000 10:17:31 AM
From: PROLIFE  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
Don't you agree that ANY post election count can only be tainted with counters attempting to divine voter intent, thereby making a tainted result?

NO good.



To: PartyTime who wrote (100045)12/4/2000 10:31:30 AM
From: md1derful  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
party..analyze the vote all you want...once the victor is announced it all becomes moot as public opinion changes each minute....it's like saying that Fla state won the orange bowl, last year and therefore is the champion....it all ends on that date and we start a new slate....unless, of course you are an historian and continue to study all this stuff...as for me...I want my tax money refunded to me!!!
doc



To: PartyTime who wrote (100045)12/4/2000 11:21:03 AM
From: Master (Hijacked)  Respond to of 769667
 
PartyT,

You are missing the point. Several of the witnesses testified that chads were falling off the ballots with every recount. Therefore, even if you personally go and recount the ballots, there is no assurance that the count will reflect the original tally because the ballots have undeniably been altered.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News