Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Alias Shrugged who wrote (43433)	12/4/2000 11:32:18 AM
From: pater tenebrarum	Respond to of 436258

i'd take one North-Am stock and one South African in that case, i.e. split up the proceeds...e.g. HM & GOLD , or HM and HGMCY. HM is imo the only reasonable North Am alternative to NEM...as it is also largely unhedged. another possibility is of course to buy BMG, which will be taken over by NEM. the ratio is 0,105 NEM per BMG stock, so you'd have to buy roughly 10 times as many BMG stocks to replace the NEM you're selling.

To: Alias Shrugged who wrote (43433)	12/4/2000 11:35:03 AM
From: patron_anejo_por_favor	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

<<What gold stock would you replace it with to avoid the wash sale?>> I'd choose AEM, they're a relatively unhedged No. American producer. HM would be a reasonable choice, though not a pure play. If you don't mind the currency exposure, then ASA, HGMCY or GOLD are options...