Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Joe NYC who wrote (120408)	12/4/2000 12:22:44 PM
From: The Duke of URL©	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

I think this means: Nov 7th cert is the only cert now existant. Judge Sauls will halt his proceeding until the FSC gives him guidance.

To: Joe NYC who wrote (120408)	12/4/2000 12:50:39 PM
From: Daniel Schuh	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Joe, you can read the actual decision at frwebgate.access.gpo.gov . If Jeb thought the Florida SC decision was written in legalese, he's not going to like this one any better, on that count anyway. What it actually says, in the end, is The judgement of the Supreme Court of Florida is therefore vacated, and the case is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion. The SC opinion is itself a bit obscure, the main objection apparently being that the Florida SC was unclear in their decision. Offhand, I'd say "not inconsistent" part leaves room for further action. As the Florida SC decision is somewhat moot at this point, with their deadline past and no change in the result, the Florida SC has to do something one way or the other anyway, to make any difference.