Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Scrapps who wrote (100314)	12/4/2000 1:47:17 PM
From: hdl	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

this case reminds me of a great case i had. when i got the case, the lawyer bringing it to me said it was the best case a lawyer could have. i asked why. he said because it won't be settled. i was and am a solo practitioner. i was in a big case with a lot of big firms. the case went on for years. whatever the judge did was appealed. there were about 20 undecided motions stacked up for him to decide- some over a year old. I made a list of them and in my argument on the motion on before the judge that day, I enumerated the motions which were sub judice. The New York City judge immediately decided to transfer the entire case to Philadelphia.