SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : VOLTAIRE'S PORCH-MODERATED -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sully- who wrote (21787)12/4/2000 2:36:53 PM
From: J. C. Dithers  Respond to of 65232
 
Thanks, Wstera. The Republicans were too polite in allowing the Dems to keep talking about "counting" ballots. When I was in school, counting meant one, two, three, four .... It certainly had nothing to do with laying on your back with a magnifying glass, holding a ballot up to the light!

J.C.



To: Sully- who wrote (21787)12/4/2000 3:02:45 PM
From: freeus  Respond to of 65232
 
I absolutely agree.
Either the person voted or he / she didn't. This is not a test that a student filled out. This is voting for officers, including the President of the major country.
The machine two counts should have ended it. I don't want a PERSON deciding some voter's intent.
Freeus
The machine maynot be completely accurate but at least it's objective. People are both inaccurate AND subjective.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News