To: HairBall who wrote (63714 ) 12/4/2000 5:21:00 PM From: OldAIMGuy Respond to of 99985 Hi LG, I modified that last post after you had already read it. I added my history since Jan. 1990 for both my IRA and my personal taxable account. Going out to the summer of 2001, I see the NASDAQ rising between 11% at the low end and 39% at the high end. I know that's a pretty big range, but don't have any way to refine it. Much of that gain will just be relieving the current selling pressure from the market. If we go back to March and pretend we had this same conversation, I would have guessed that the NASDAQ might have fallen 33% to 50% but wouldn't have been more specific then either. The long term central value of my IW graph is almost exactly 40 (the center of the Average Risk range), so any divergence from that as the pendulum swings usually has to be "corrected" later on. In March, it hit about 60, so falling to 40 would have been the 33% decline and a fall all the way to 30 (where the IW signals Low Risk) would have been about a 50% decline. Today the IW's showing a value of 36. So, a rise to 40 would be about 11% while to rise to 50 would be the 39% possible gain. All of this assumes that the earnings of the companies themselves stay essentially steady for the period. Here's the graphs that shows the short term (three+ years) history of each of the components. aim-users.com (composite)aim-users.com (valuation component)aim-users.com (speculation component)aim-users.com (divergent opinion component)aim-users.com (net IPO growth vs consolidations and delistings) Right now two of the four are showing Bullish signals. The other two are in their Neutral zones. It is most significant when all four components are in harmony. That's pretty rare, however. I have data going back to 1982 available for anyone to download if they want to study this stuff in any detail. It's at aim-users.com Best regards, Tom All the