Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Petz who wrote (120537)	12/4/2000 6:41:20 PM
From: Road Walker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

John, re: "If you read the letters sent to the Sec'y, you would understand why she rejected their recount proposals." Sorry, I don't buy it. There is no way, with her history, that she should have been in any way involved in any election decision. You have to admit, if she was on the other side of you position, you would object. Her decisions CAN'T be weighed without her bias as the campaign manager for Bush in Florida. John

To: Petz who wrote (120537)	12/5/2000 12:06:21 AM
From: Joe NYC	Respond to of 186894

John, If you read the letters sent to the Sec'y, you would understand why she rejected their recount proposals. I read the letters, and the only one that was in the ballpark of arguing their case was (to my surprise) the Palm Beach County. The Broward county letter was a joke, and Miami Dade county didn't even want to do the recount (at that time), only to add 6 votes to Gore from their 1 precinct sample. Now, with the US SC ruling, they should remove the Broward county recount from the official results. Joe