Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Scumbria who wrote (62351)	12/4/2000 6:24:04 PM
From: Dave B	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93625

Scumbria, While it is difficult to distinguish stupidity from corruption as the cause of a bad decision, it is invariably one or the other. Fine, you're not going to support your claim of corruption. However, you shouldn't throw around terms like "corruption" without some clue as to what you're talking about. So they're either stupid or corrupt, according to you. Of course, you shouldn't be so hard on your party members. I'm sure you're aware that most of the judges involved are Democrat (maybe all, since I can't think of a single Republican judge involved in these cases, but I don't know all their names or affiliations). Sanders Sauls is a Democrat (according to the SJ Mercury in yesterday's edition), Barton is a Democrat, the majority of the canvassing boards in the disputed counties were Democrats, and the FLSC is all Democrat (or at least were all appointed by Democrats). Their "corrupt bias" is clearly showing through. Or maybe it's their stupidity. I guess we can't tell. Dave