Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Electoral College 2000 - Ahead of the Curve -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TraderGreg who wrote (4669)	12/4/2000 6:41:18 PM
From: jttmab	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6710

While the decision was a surprise to me; I suppose, in retrospect, it shouldn't have been. I think the history of the Court is that they really hate setting new precedent. They usually [not always] dodge it by refusing to hear a case or setting a very narrow interpretation [which they couldn't do in this case]. The only thing left, with that strategy was to "twhat"...the ball is back in your FSC. but they do know that the FSC will twhat it back to them. [thwat is not a legal term] jttmab