Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Scumbria who wrote (120565)	12/4/2000 7:39:41 PM
From: Road Walker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Scumbria, Right or wrong aside, it would not be good for the country if Gore were to "win". The perception is that Bush has won; if Gore were to take it on a technicality, even Democrats would cry foul. And the Elmer's and Joe's, the radical right, would make compromise impossible. Give it up, in two years the Democrats will control both houses, in four years they will probably have the Presidency as well. And nothing significant will happen under Bush. It's the best result, from your perspective. John

To: Scumbria who wrote (120565)	12/4/2000 7:47:03 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

Scumbria, <The harder Gore fights, the better it will be long term. Especially if he can make Bush look really bad in the process. > Sounds like the textbook strategy of a Sore Loserman. The only reason why Gore fights now is to bring Bush down with him, even if his hopes of winning the presidency are close to nil. But I guess Gore personally has nothing to lose now. Too bad the Democrats still have a lot to lose from Gore's antics. Tenchusatsu

To: Scumbria who wrote (120565)	12/5/2000 10:55:12 AM
From: Joe NYC	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Scumbria, The harder Gore fights, the better it will be long term. Especially if he can make Bush look really bad in the process. You may be well in tune with the Clinton / Gore view of the world, where the a$$holes prevail because gentlemen rather yield than step to the level of the a$$holes. It works well as long as the gentlemen are content to losing to the a$$holes of the world, which in the long run is not going to happen. As a result, there will be no more "nice guys" or gentlemen, only a$$holes. It's not the world I want my daughter to grow up in, so on this count you win. Joe