SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Anthony@Pacific who wrote (64112)12/5/2000 1:57:59 AM
From: Cheeky Kid  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 122087
 
You didn't specify what SEVU IR camera you wanted when you put up the challenge.

So I guess I win by technicality. I would like the 1000 dollars to go to the Salvation Army. (As one poster said, why not have the monies sent to charity)

You posted:

To: Anthony@Pacific who wrote (64096)
From: Anthony@Pacific
Monday, December 4, 2000 10:50 PM ET
Reply # of 64119

ATTENTION TO ALL !!!

I am prepared to pay $ 1,000 to anyone who can give me the name and phone number of any store any where in the UNITED STATES that has a SEVU IR camera that I can actually buy..

PLease make sure the item is carried and I will call to confirm and a check will be issued immediatley.

I have not been ablet o find on anywher..all they have is that super stupid barnacle viewing underwater POS camera that nobody except barnacle scrapers need.

_____________

RE:
Message 14945251



To: Anthony@Pacific who wrote (64112)12/5/2000 11:03:30 AM
From: StocksDATsoar  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 122087
 
SEVU = MCBRIDEOFFRANKINSTEIN

YOU BETTER READ THIS POST FROM A POSTER ON RAGINGBULL..

WOW!!!!!!

ragingbull.altavista.com



To: Anthony@Pacific who wrote (64112)12/5/2000 4:16:13 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 122087
 
I am sure the investment community would like to see a copy of this law suit and all the papers that were filed. Anyone know how one could get a copy?

Anyone got a scanner?

Francois Goelo had filed an action in Hillsboro County Circuit Court(Case No.
00-1444) against TrimFast Group, Inc.,Michael Muzio and certain other parties
in connection with alleged non-delivery of 22,000 shares of TrimFast and 100,000
shares of common stock of Sierra Holdings Group. The complaint,is a multi-count
complaint and included counts for breach of contract, specific performance,
fraud and civil theft.The complaint alleged that a total of $95,750 ($77,000 for
the TrimFast shares) was delivered as per the instructions of Mr. Muzio. The
shares of common stock that had not been delivered to Mr. Goelo, as Mr.
Muzio has advised the Company, were shares of common stock personally owned by
Mr. Muzio. The Plaintiff sought delivery of the shares of common stock
pursuant to the agreement and sought compensatory and punitive damages in excess
of $790,000. On May 3, 2000 plaintiff offered to settle this matter whereby Mr.
Muzio would pay $95,750 and transfer to the plaintiff 20,000 shares of TrimFast
common stock. In addition, the settlement offer provided that the parties will
enter into a joint stipulation for dismissal of the action and execution of a
general release. We subsequently signed a written settlement agreement with Mr.
Goelo and Mr. Muzio, and Mr. Goelo has released the other parties, including the
Company, from all liabilities or obligations. As part of this settlement, the
litigation was dismissed and the Company was not required to make any payment,
or give any shares, to Mr. Goelo.

tenkwizard.com