Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Zeev's Turnips -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bosco who wrote (266)	12/5/2000 7:49:06 AM
From: Zeev Hed	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 644

Well, I would hate it to come down to Seminole, but if we are going to follow the letter of the law, then it should be followed in Seminole as well, and last time they had ballots application filled by someone other than the voter, a family member or an "appointee" by the voter (need paper trail on these 4700 ballots for that one), all the absentee ballots were taken out (in this case, 14,000?). Let see if one law is applicable in Dade and another law in Seminole. See you this afternoon, and enjoy the morning rally. Zeev

To: Bosco who wrote (266)	12/6/2000 4:50:04 AM
From: Carl R.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 644

Bosco, you are right that we'll have less to talk about. I suppose we'll have to go back to talking about turnips. LOL Actually I disagree with you re: Boies. Even if he could have talked the FSC into stepping in he would have only gained a couple days on the counting. Boies is a good attorney and I'm sure he knew the risks. The same goes for the Republican attorneys who have no doubt offended the Judge in Seminole County by asking her to recuse herself (she declined). Apparently the reason is that she is a Democrat and was recently passed over for promotion by Jeb Bush. Re: Seminole County The pre-printed ballot applications didn't include the voters' registration numbers, as required by law. cnn.com Thus I guess that the county screwed up in the first place an the voter ID should have been printed on the application that was sent to the voter. At least this is my understanding from the above sentence. Also I note that it has been alleged that filling in the voter ID was a violation of Federal and State law, and I have been taking this as a given, but apparently there is some question about that. From the same piece: "It's not an illegal act, it's not a felonious act and the plaintiffs are just wrong -- plain and simple," defense lawyer Jim Hattaway said. I have to concede that I have absolutely no idea what the law is in this area, nor what the precedents are. Heck, I don't even know what the facts are. Thus I couldn't begin to tell you if what happened was legal, illegal, or otherwise, nor what remedy has been awarded in prior cases. Therefore I, like you, will be relegated to just watching this one to see how it develops. I also note that Gore is going to switch his message from "Count every vote" to "exclude every vote". LOL From the same article: While the merits of the lawsuit will be tried Wednesday, Gore could face a political problem by supporting the Seminole County case or its companion in Martin County, CNN election law analyst David Cardwell said. It would be bad public relations, Cardwell said, to fight a case before one Florida court arguing that all ballots should be counted, while arguing before another that thousands of ballots should be thrown out. It just goes to show that there are no grand principles involved here, it's merely a matter doing whatever it takes to win. Carl