Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : VOLTAIRE'S PORCH-MODERATED -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: edamo who wrote (21957)	12/5/2000 9:05:55 AM
From: im a survivor	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 65232

Ed....whaddya think bout those 03 atml $10 leaps freeus was mentioning? Going for a tad over $5. As RR stated we are looking at 48% in 2 years, but they are ITM as of right now....so If atml moves, the leaps should move nicely and the two years takes care of any time frame to worry about.....not much open interest though. Any opinions? I also hold the 12.50's ( may this year ) Thanks Keith

To: edamo who wrote (21957)	12/5/2000 9:34:57 AM
From: Jim Willie CB	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 65232

Ed, USSC gave clear signal repudiating FLSC justification but they did so without seriously harming FLSC's image USSC could have reversed extended deadline, scolded them for infringing upon Legislature's authority, and scolded them again for causing some chaos they could have said FLSC acted as a political body attempting to expedite a difficult conflicting situation but in the meantime they changed rule expostfacto, threatening due process USSC treated FLSC with kid gloves they made their point with a clear signal, yes but they managed not to thoroughly embarrass FLSC the real intelligent population and the legal community regard for sure the USSC wording as a clear repudiation but NOT in the eyes of 95% of America, which view it as punt FLSC must remain solidly in charge, respected, looked up to the last thing we need now is for a big dispute over FLSC you know, an attack from the Right, countered by Left, questioning its authority, doubting its potential role to end this election dispute that would add to the chaos by an order of magnitude we basically have a big battle here: idealistic view on voting rights VERSUS practical voting procedures if I had written the USSC ruling, unconcerned about consequence politically, I would have slammed FLSC ten times worse / Jim