SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Stock Attack -- A Complete Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: donald sew who wrote (37270)12/5/2000 9:07:50 AM
From: faro  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 42787
 
History could repeat itself as in 1994!

Could AG succeed again a soft landing!

If he does, based on 1994 numbers, we could see 3800 on the NAZ by the end of December and 4700 by late January.

In 94, the Naz gain half of its lost (between March and first week of December) in December and reached 90% of the March high in January 95.

Another correction occured at the end of January 95 which brought the NAZ at half of the 94 losses, and then, it went up for quite a while.

Faro



To: donald sew who wrote (37270)12/5/2000 9:14:42 AM
From: briskit  Respond to of 42787
 
QQQ trading at discount to NDX 30-Nov: As noted in the What We’re Watching section on the home page, QQQ closed at its biggest discount in months. The Nasdaq 100 Trust (QQQ) equals 1/40th of the Nasdaq 100. Using SharpCharts with the Nasdaq 100 and selecting QQQ for the price relative indicator will display the Nasdaq 100/QQQ ratio. QQQ is trading at a discount when the ratio is above 40 and at a premium when below 40. I believe this sizable discount could indicate some panic in the market and possibly a near term bottom. Playing such a bottom is another story. stockcharts.com

Seems I remember somebody asking something about this the other day. Or not. FWIW Regards, Onward thru the fog!



To: donald sew who wrote (37270)12/5/2000 9:24:17 AM
From: dennis michael patterson  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 42787
 
Yeah that's me: Clark Kent!!!!