SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Nortel Networks (NT) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: unix_daemon who wrote (8996)12/5/2000 7:19:20 PM
From: bosquedog  Respond to of 14638
 
Clearly you can not read.

I am off to the spa for 1/2 hour.

Feel free to continue to be wrong.



To: unix_daemon who wrote (8996)12/5/2000 8:53:53 PM
From: bosquedog  Respond to of 14638
 
The Day Something Snapped
By James J. Cramer

12/5/00 7:32 AM ET



Click here for the latest from James J. Cramer.


We had just finished a magnificent trading day, making money, big money, despite the decline in the stock market. Jeff Berkowitz and Matt Jacobs provided us with continual gossip out of the Credit Suisse First Boston conference, while Todd and I manned the office and made terrific bets, mostly against stocks. I would have gone home just then, after penning my closing column, but there was still one more big report to come. After the close we huddled around our screens, waiting for Brocade (BRCD:Nasdaq - news - boards) to announce its quarter. Long a favorite of mine, Brocade represented the remaining momentum position on our sheets, a hard-won position in an office where we think the momentum stocks, or the one-time momentum stocks, are simply poison. Owning Brocade had become a great source of internal tension. How could we be long a momentum stock at a time when momentum funds are being taken out and shot on a daily basis? What made Brocade so immune? Who was I to demand that Brocade stay even after I had bashed all of the other momentum stocks in our meetings at Cramer Berkowitz and in my columns? To which I always said the same: Brocade is out-executing everyone -- everyone! -- and until it is done out-executing everyone, I want to be long it.

Then Brocade reported. It was a perfect number. Picture perfect. There was some smashed fly on the wall who may have been looking for some sequential number that was stronger, but that's a pile of *&@#$! This was all upside. Thing of beauty. Mesmerizing in its perfection. Of course, though, Altera (ALTR:Nasdaq - news - boards) picked that moment to blow up. Big-time.

While Altera is barely correlated with Brocade, the latter started sinking like a stone. I knew it was a buy as I saw it slice through 150, and we bid and got hit for some. Whack, right upside the 150 head. Next thing you know, however, it is at 144. Down six. In 60 seconds. Like some sort of Mercedes in reverse. I am out of answers. I think that is just plain wrong. We are playing lean, however, and I didn't want to inflict any damage on our year. I listened as someone on the tube yammered that the stock was going lower. I saw the bids disappearing. I saw the loss mounting. I was sweating and angry, shaking my head. Todd-o looked at me and asked me what was wrong. He wanted to know how he could help me. That is was no big deal. We blew it, no big deal.

"No Big Deal?" I screamed. "No big !@#$%! deal? Hundred Gs just like that is no big deal?" He coolly reminded me that we had made over a million dollars trading that day. I could not be soothed. "Who the !@#$%! cares about the million dollars when we just lost on Brocade?" I shouted. I don't even know why, but I punctuated each word with a smashing of my key board. "Don't you understand that?" I shouted, keys flying all over the place as my key board cracked in half and then in quarters as I dashed the remnants. " Don't you know that's how I think, how I am?" And with that I grabbed my phone and mashed every key on the board. The plastic pieces shot left and right, six, ten feet in an arc.

"Not only that," I said, as I crushed my phone against my desk, sending splinters of black plastic toward my friend Jeannie Cullen, "but the day I stop caring about those hundred Gs is the !@#$%! day that I should hang it up. That's the day they carry me out of here. That's the day I deserve to be carried out of here." I then dashed into my private office, paged Matt and Jeff in Scottsdale at the conference, and screamed the same illogic at them, breaking a second keyboard, a coffee mug and a half dozen pencils. I was out of my mind with anger about the stupid Brocade. Caught, like those morons Buzz and Batch, I said to myself. "No better than those mo-mo fools," I screamed to the shellshocked office, everyone with head down, perhaps because they didn't want to be hit by what I shattered next.

I was shaking, just shaking. Livid that I had screwed up the Brocade. Ruined the day. Botched it. Just !@##$%! botched it. I sat at my desk for an hour after that. Tension rolling up and down my body. Trying to figure out how I could still be so upset after so many years of doing this job.

Meanwhile, though, we didn't sell Brocade at $144, we held on and now it's at $184. Buys a lot of keyboards!

But sitll, as I went home that night, I thought about what I said: The day I stop caring about Brocade is the day I should hang it up. And I realize that I had it wrong. I would never live to see the day I stopped caring about Brocade if I kept up like this. I would indeed be carried out, with an epitaph no better than, "Beaten by Brocade." That's when I knew it was time for me to make a change.

Oh sure, I had been thinking about it ever since 1997, our glorious plus-60% year that I should have retired after, but, no, I had to have another go-round. I had to have one more year. And then in 1998, my well-chronicled failure occurred, the plus-2% year when it should have been 50%. I have written extensively about that year, but there was no way to hang it up after that. That's how bums go out. Ain't no bum. Not this guy. Sure we shot the lights out in 1999, but who didn't? How many readers wrote me that out plus-62% was chickenfeed compared to what they did with leverage and a lot of Island or E.piphany or Applied Micro Circuits. Nah, 62% didn't mean jack.

This year, however, as I watched one momentum fund after another stumble, as I watched the chartists get blown out and the daytraders and hyperleveraged hotshots get blown back to their day jobs, I knew we were working on something big, a big plus-30% year, or more, trading, betting health care, betting against capex, betting with the foods, betting against the semis. This year it all came together for us, as we had zero tolerance for errors, zero tolerance for the Brocade speculations that I had just insisted on. We played to the hilt, with everything we had, with hours extended far beyond reason with an intensity that bordered on -- and, in my case, had crossed into -- the insane.

The very next day Jeff mentioned we couldn't keep going like this. Something had to give. Nobody could live like this, nobody could function in a world where the right thing to do was to be carried out horizontally because that was the only way to prove, in the end, that you cared as much as you should. I agreed. I said it was time for me to retire. And I did.



To: unix_daemon who wrote (8996)12/5/2000 8:54:26 PM
From: bosquedog  Respond to of 14638
 
Kicking a Computer Monitor Can Be So Satisfying
By James J. Cramer

12/5/00 3:38 PM ET



Click here for the latest from James J. Cramer.


Most of you seemed shocked that I would smash a couple of keyboards over a broken Brocade (BRCD:Nasdaq - news - boards) trade. (Especially one that turned out to be a huge winner.) My brother-in-law, though, wasn't. Todd Mason knows me for the angry, miserable cur I can be when things go against me at the fund. He asked me earlier this afternoon whether I had ever broken a computer monitor in an outburst.

I said "Nah, I've never broken a monitor." At which point my friend and colleague Jeannie Cullen, cleared her throat and said, "Not in the last three years." She said it out loud, kind of to no one, but the point was made. Yes, four years ago, when I was far more active in trading than I am now, I was faced with one of those horrid tech mornings that we know so well. Some semiconductor company had blown up, reduced to smithereens, and I thought it created a potential for a crescendo bottom. I was keying on Intel. I always key on Intel. I am an Intelaholic. I can't go a minute without thinking about Intel. And I noticed that at about 9:47 a.m. Intel, which had been plummeting, had stopped going down. It stood there, like a stone wall, no matter what happened.

"Intel's bottomed, " I shouted out. "Take 25 Intel." Which means buy 25,000 Intel. I waited another minute. "Look at this Intel. It stays there no matter what the averages do. Take another 25,000." We quickly bought the stock. The Nazz dropped another 50 points in a flash. I marveled. "I want another 50,000 Intel. This is the strongest stock I have ever seen." ( I am note sure of the exact amounts or prices but it was certainly in that ballpark.)We were filled immediately and still the market fell. "I love this Intel, I love it, " I screamed at the top of my lungs. "This stock is amazing."

Finally, Jeannie spoke up. "Ahhh, Jim, I don't see Intel stopping here." Nonsense, I assured her. It had held at 35 all morning. Actually, she said. "It is down 5 from there. And it is continuing to get crushed. What should we do with all of this Intel?" I told her she had no idea what she was talking about. And I turned my Bridge screen to her.

"Jim, your screen is frozen."

Those were the days before I had any control of my temper. I picked up my monitor and I threw it at the window. Then I dumped the desk that the CPU was on. Then I kicked the monitor with my foot until shards of glass spread throughout the room. And then I sat down and fumed. Jeannie came over to me. She wanted to know what she should do. I shook my head and said "Jeannie, I think I need a new Bridge."

Yeah, I took this game way too seriously. I can't believe I stuck with it as long as I have in the way that I play it. Looks like my monitor-kicking days are now over.

Thank Heavens! Or as Jeff Berkowitz just said; "You know who doesn't want you to retire? Furniture and computer makers



To: unix_daemon who wrote (8996)12/5/2000 8:55:54 PM
From: bosquedog  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 14638
 
JJC Will Retire From Cramer Berkowitz
By James J. Cramer

Originally posted at 9:33 AM ET 12/4/00 on RealMoney.com




Click here for the latest from James J. Cramer.

No one can believe it, which tells me it is even more right than I thought. Yep, I am getting out of the hedge fund game. I am retiring from Cramer Berkowitz at the end of the year and turning this great firm over to my trusted partner, Jeff Berkowitz. Rather than have you speculate on the real skinny, I am going to share with you what I am sharing with my partners at my hedge fund.

Dear Partner:

When I started this firm 14 years ago, I always dreamed that we would build a team that could last far after I decided I no longer wanted to run money. We now have that team and it is time for me to step aside and let the younger, hungrier players, especially my terrific partner for the last decade, Jeff Berkowitz, take over.

It's been almost 20 years since I started running managing money for individuals, and I have regarded it as a terrific daily challenge that has consumed about as much of me as I think I can allow it before I become too tired and spent to do other things. But after a great run, I long for other challenges that, at this point in my life, seem more compelling to me: family, my writing and, yes, for those of who know me best, fun. Plain unadulerated fun. Fun with my wife. Fun with my beautiful daughters, before they are too old to want to be with their daddy.

Recently a respected Washington Post writer, Howard Kurtz, penned a book, called The Fortune Tellers, about me and a few other people who have become high-profile in this new world of finance. It was a sympathetic portrait of someone who would stop at nothing legal to make money for his partners, who bled for performance and for the highest return with the least risk. It presented me as I truly have become. A book critic reviewed it in the San Francisco Examiner and noted the following: "In his office by 5 a.m. each day, Cramer gives workaholism a bad name. It's amazing that a man so wealthy and successful can still be so manic and miserable." I cut it out and taped it right next to a Post-It drawing my wife, Karen, penned of a tombstone which says, "He Worked Hard." I have looked at these two squibs of paper every day for months and have marveled at their poignancy for my situation. But what would I do? How could I leave?

Then, near year-end, it hit me. I knew how I could leave: on top, with the best possible performance we could deliver for our partners. It has been my lifelong ambition to deliver a great year when the indices were so horrid. It means the world to me. And I can do it now, and know that I will be leaving us -- because I intend to keep my money in the fund and remain a limited partner -- with a fantastic team and a great legacy. What greater way to express my confidence in Jeff than to leave my money in with the fund. I would recommend you do the same. Jeff has worked with me for eight years and his name has been on the door since January 1997. He and I have handpicked a fantastic group, including Todd Harrison, our head trader, with 11 years in the business, and Matt Jacobs, our research director, who may be the smartest young talent I have EVER seen. These guys are just the tops in the business. It would not surprise me that, no matter how hard the market, this team continues to generate super returns.

You limited partners have been fabulous to me, given me a chance to work with you for so many years. I now want to become one of you, helping Jeff and his great team from the sidelines. I will do everything I can to make this as smooth a transition as possible. And then I am going to have a huge amount of fun. Thanks so much.

There it is. Not much more to say. I wanted to go out on top. I want to write more. I want to do more TV. I want to write a book. I want to help TheStreet.com (TSCM:Nasdaq - news). I want to see my family. I want to say, "Yes" to my daughters rather than "No, I am sorry, I am too busy." And I just can't wait.



To: unix_daemon who wrote (8996)12/6/2000 8:54:24 PM
From: bosquedog  Respond to of 14638
 
Todd and Gary Chat on Real Money.com today stated:

dillybee-guest: Hi, guys, you both make T.A. very sexy. The Toronto Stock Exchange is pretty much hostage to Nortel. Any idea where Nortel's heading? And do you ever chart the TSE? Thanks, from all your Canadian readers.

RM_GaryB: NT looks like it's put in a bottom. It's tough to trade, though, since there's been so much damage done. But, I wouldn't want to be short the stock. Re: TSE, I don't look at it. Sorry.

RM_Todd: Yeah, baby! I will get jazzy when/if it gets to 49 and has a chance to fill that gap. Wow, wait a sec, NT breaks a triple top at 41! Nice, will put on radar, maybe a Dec 40 call position.



To: unix_daemon who wrote (8996)12/7/2000 9:03:19 PM
From: bosquedog  Respond to of 14638
 
Message 14969930