SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : VitalStream Holdings Inc. (VSTH) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: blebovits who wrote (422)12/5/2000 11:12:20 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 447
 
Cling to that glimmer of hope. Hope has not left us entirely.

The first myth holds that Pandora was sent by Zeus to Prometheus and Epimetheus as a punishment for stealing fire from heaven and giving it to man. Zeus gave Pandora a jar and told her she dare not open it under any circumstance. Pandora's curiosity piqued, and she removed the lid allowing all manner of evil and of illness to escape and spread across the earth. Pandora quickly tried to replace the lid but to no avail. Everything had escaped with the exception of Hope, which lay at the bottom of the jar. And so it is that no matter whatever evils are abroad, Hope has not left us entirely.



To: blebovits who wrote (422)12/6/2000 12:08:51 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 447
 
Net2Wireless withdraws from another merger, signing death warrant for Contact
06.12.2000 | 08:43
TheMarker.com
themarker.com

News released by TheMarker.com of the closing ofContact Networks, previously considered to be one of the hottest Internet companies in Israel, continues to make waves.

Ma’ariv reports on Wednesday that Contact.com was supposed to have been taken over by Net2Wireless, the startup whose merger with Utah-based Sensar Corporation (Nasdaq:SCII) has been cancelled.

Net2Wireless, headed by David Rubner and Hemi Davidson, was supposed to buy Contact for $20 million to avert its collapse. With the deal dead and buried, Contact - founded by Eyal Herzog and Arnon Dinor - was forced to close its doors and fire all of its employees.

In any case, Net2Wireless is in no condition to buy anything right now, following the cancellation of its merger with Sensar.

Sensar stock is 98% down from its peak, to $1.5. Nasdaq yesterday announced that if Sensar went ahead and merged with Net2Wireless, it would be delisted. The stock exchange's reasons apparently have to do with two of the shareholders involved in the deal, with whom Nasdaq has had legal tangles in the past.

Performance of Sensar stock



In return for release from its obligations under the merger agreement wiht Sensar, Net2Wireless has agreed to allocate Sensar 3 million shares and an option to buy another million shares at $10 each. That price is significantly lower than $27, the price per share at the company’s latest placement.

For its part, Sensar will write off a $500,000 loan to Net2Wireless and will pay $1.5 million in cash for a some of the shares issued to it by the Israeli company.

The companies aren't disclosing how many Net2Wireless shares Sensar is paying for, making it hard to calculate the exact price per share paid by Sensar. But assuming that Sensar isn't getting stock for free, and is paying for most of the shares it got, it wound up investing in the startup at less than $1 per share. That is seriously below the price at which Net2Wireless netted investors and lower even than the $1.86 a share, the exercise price of stock options allocated to its executives, among them chairman David Rubner.

In other words, though Sensar is the one to transfer cash money under the aforementioned agreement, the one actually buying its freedom is Net2Wireless. The startup's main incentive behind its reverse merger with Sensar was to get a back door onto Nasdaq. With the door slammed, its incentive is gone. Net2Wireless’ activity was to merge into Sensar’s idle framework, thus becoming a company publicly traded on Nasdaq.



To: blebovits who wrote (422)12/7/2000 11:28:48 AM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 447
 
With such friends
05.12.2000 | 15:57
Jonathan Nassie
themarker.com

How much would you pay for the Brooklyn Bridge? If you’re reading TheMarker.com, probably not a penny. You’d figure you were being taken. But there are probably a lot of goofs out there who’d pony up with a happy smile and pad off to pen a postcard to Maw.

The lawsuit pressed by Alrov against Net2Wireless and its chairman, David Rubner, one of the better-known figures in the Israeli hi-tech industry, paints a picture something like that: Rubner standing on the ramp to a bridge selling a pack of lies to passing investors in order to get their money.

There were apparently a lot of goofs out there prepared to pony up. But Alrov’s Alfred Akirov was the first to yell, I’ve been had.

Akirov’s lawsuit is deadly serious. It mentions major sums of money and raises claims of fraud and false presentations. His claims wait examination by the courts. We don’t know what the defendant will say yet. But even before we hear the other side of the affair, even before the courts have their say, the lawsuit does accomplish something. It describes the atmosphere at the time in the Israeli hi-tech arena. Although those careless days are probably gone forever, it should be said.

If Akirov's description of the chain of events is accurate, Rubner has some explaining to do. Another problem is that Akirov, who leaped into a major investment without looking first, probably wasn’t the only careless and happy-go-lucky businessman in Israel during the hi-tech heyday of late 1999. Back in 1993, a rumor circulating a Tel Aviv café was enough to set oil stocks spiraling skywards. In early 2000, apparently, a whisper to the unwise was enough to prise loose a check for $5 million.

Psst! A pirated Dr Dre? A fish? A hi-tech company?
“Rubner took the trouble to inform Akirov that if he did indeed manage in the short time left to wedge the Alrov group into the investment, he’d be doing him a big favor, because it was a one-time opportunity,” Akirov states in his lawsuit.

Take a stroll around the open-air vegetable, fruit and pirate-CD markets of any Israeli city. “It costs me more than that, you’re getting a special price just for you,” you’ll hear. In the veggie market, okay, but in hi-tech? When the prices are in the millions? In a conversation between two of Israel’s leading businessmen?

Apparently, just so. Rubner apparently really was one of Alfred Akirov’s good friends. He apparently did devote the days following their chat to persuading the other investors to let Alrov in too. And lo, after a few days he called Akirov back, saying that his efforts had not been in vain. He’d managed to persuade the “group of investors” to let Alrov invest too, under certain conditions.

The conditions involved the magnitude of the investment: $3 million to $5 million, a decision by Alrov on the spot, and signatures within days. The punch-line: the tight schedule did not permit additional background checks on Net2Wireless, or amendment to the investment documents or terms.

In other words, Rubner was telling Akirov that he (Rubner) had made a terrific effort to allow him (Akirov) to invest it ($5 million) in a startup (Net2Wireless) without giving him (Akirov) a chance (even a wee one) to check the company (Net2Wireless) or to amend the investment agreement (to make it more reasonable, for example).

Put otherwise, Akirov examined his new investment about as carefully as you’d examine a candy bar at the grocery before forking over your dollar.

The mystery “lead investor”
Any venture capital fund manager would carry out an intense due diligence process for much smaller sums of money. He’d meet with the startup’s management, have its technology checked by external experts, and comb its market for potential competitors, which he would then evaluate. And that’s for starters. He might also demand to meet with reps of key potential clients to hear their requirements of the product. Then he’d butt heads with the company, wrestle over the company valuation for the purposes of the investment, and finally, finally, if they manage to come to terms, he and his lawyer will sit down and compile a contract stipulating everything from stock options to protection from dilution and the right to invest in further rounds.

But Akirov comes from the real estate industry, not venture capital. He didn’t even go visit the company or meet with its managers. Three days after receiving Rubner’s nod, he sent over a commitment to invest $5 million. Akirov did append his lawyer’s comments to the terms of investment to his letter of commitment, but addressed his missive to the “lead investor”, as Rubner had forbidden him to make any changes in the agreement. Changes, he said, were the province of the “lead investor”. Which, according to Rubner’s presentation, was supposed to be Goldman Sachs and funds run by George Soros.

Akirov’s decision relied on Goldman Sachs leading the investment and carrying out due diligence on the company. Indeed, Goldman Sachs is as classy a lead investor as one could hope for. But the thing is, as Akirov notes in his lawsuit – neither Goldman Sachs nor Soros were actually mentioned in the list of investors in the agreement. Weird, he thought to himself, but his suspicions weren’t aroused yet, not at that stage. He relied on Rubner’s presentation that they were indeed the lead investors in Net2Wireless, even if not mentioned by name in the investment agreement.

Fact and fiction
Fact: Neither Goldman Sachs nor Soros ever put so much as $1 into Net2Wireless. Rubner had taken their names in vain when dropping them to lull Akirov into investing in the startup without looking at it first.

Akirov explains that he discovered the same presentation had been made to all the investors: all were told that the due diligence process was being carried out by a “lead investor”. That was a fiction.

Fact: At the end of the day there was no classy investor leading the pack and investigating the startup, there was no leader at all. Everybody else trusted that somebody else had done it.

Fact: Akirov agreed to invest $5 million in a startup for less than 1% of its equity, a transaction valuing it at more than half a billion dollars. More than the value of Scitex Corporation (Nasdaq:SCIX), for instance. He did it without checking the company in any way or talking with the other investors. Rubner could as well have sold him a piece of a company that makes rubber rats.

Would Akirov have leaped so readily into a deal to buy a piece of building that he was told was worth half a billion dollars? Wouldn’t he have driven over to make sure it really existed?

Akirov may have a serious case against Rubner, or maybe he doesn’t, but Rubner’s reputation has sure taken a beating from the Net2Wireless affair. But that isn’t the end of matters, probably. Alrov stock is traded on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange. Akirov’s name is likely to appear on another lawsuit: that of Alrov’s shareholders, leveling accusations against him.

Net2Wireless comments
In response to Akirov’s claims, Net2Wireless comments that it has read the lawsuit and Mr Akirov’s claims, and that they are utterly baseless. The company states that Mr Akirov knew that his claims were incorrect, and that he is trying to impose illegitimate pressure on the company to void his investment after learning that at this stage, it is not worthwhile. The company said it has handed the matter over to its lawyers



To: blebovits who wrote (422)12/8/2000 11:43:34 AM
From: StockDung  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 447
 
Someone is writting for a comedy script?
===========================================

Sensar Announces Rescheduled Conference Call

THURSDAY, DECEMBER 7, 2000 6:31:00 PM EST
SALT LAKE CITY, Dec 7, 2000 /PRNewswire via COMTEX/ -- Sensar Corporation (Nasdaq: SCII) announced that its scheduled conference call was unable to be completed due to difficulties at AT&T Telephone Conferencing Center. Apparently, AT&T placed all the participant calls into the host site and blocked the Company's access. The conference call was scheduled to discuss the recent developments at the Company as set forth in its filing on Form 8-K of today.

The conference call has been rescheduled for 4:05 p.m. Eastern Time 05 on Friday, December 8, 2000. The telephone number to participate is 1-877-331-6867. The Participant Code is 748139.

SOURCE Sensar Corporation

CONTACT: Investor Relations of Sensar Corporation, 801-350-0587,
fax 801-350-0825
(SCII)

prnewswire.com
(C) 2000 PR Newswire. All rights reserved.

KEYWORD: Utah
INDUSTRY KEYWORD: CPR
SUBJECT CODE: OTC



To: blebovits who wrote (422)12/8/2000 4:56:09 PM
From: StockDung  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 447
 
I am on the call, guess he missed this-->SCII: “You’ll Have to Talk to my Wife about that”
Other working titles:
“What does SCII, WPEC, WKID, USCM, RRRR, FUSN, all have in common.” or
“All they care about is if we filed it, so put it down, remember nobody reads the filings anyways”

As many of you may know, TheTruthseeker has been profiling a new wave of stocks that build their valuation on the pillars of the Internet Bubble without regards to traditional valuations. It’s the “premise of the potential”, and not the “prospects of profits” that is spun to investors, and commentators. To this regard TheTruthseeker has been profiling SCII, and stated that it was a good example of this new class of stocks. But today SCII breaks out of that model and shines all by itself. (You can locate the 3 prior reports on the Silicon Investor SCII thread)

I would like to organize this in the easiest way to read, the issues and connections are complex. I will attempt to lay it out as best I can, however this may in fact be a working document. There is no easy way to explain this nuts and bolts stuff.

1. SCII is a NASDAQ Shell with only cash assets. Through a complex set of negotiations with ITES/Net2Wireless, the two companies are attempting to Merger with N2W becoming the controlling company.

2. Net2Wireless was created in December of 1999, with technology it purchased from ITES. ITES had a deal already with SCII, for some reason that deal was displaced.

3. Currently at around 20 dollars, SCII/N2W have no sales, or contracts involving Sales, with the 6.5 Million shares the market Cap is around 130 Million dollars. After the Merger there will be some 40 Million shares the majority freely tradable, and a Market Cap of 800 Million. Again NO SALES.

4. N2W has been selling shares to Insider investors for as little an effective 16 cents per share.

5. N2W burn rate is increasing dramatically, with uncontrolled hiring, and paying contractors 700,000 per year.

6. The Merger has been on the books since October of last year, the terms have changed many times and the SEC is requiring Amended S-4 to be filed. The latest version came out 9/14.

7. Also on 9/14 SCII files a S-3/A a prospectus for the sale of some 10+ Million shares. At current levels they will be extracting about 200 million worth of equity in the Shell Merger into a NASDAQ company affair.

a. The founder is selling 3.2 Million Shares
b. A current insider who ML Partners is selling all 5 Million of its recently acquired warrants to N2W.
c. The current management of SCII which hold only 1.4 percent of the current SCII shares is granted huge chunks of shares with the completion of the Merger. They will be sell as a group about 2 Million of these newly minted shares. So the current holders of SCII are retail it would seem.

8. Over 800K of institutional ownership was reduced, with FMR selling all 500K shares out, etc etc.

9. Naomi Bodner is a holder of 16 % of N2W

10. Laura Huberfield is a holder of 16% of N2W

11. ML Partners sold (or transferred) warrants to both Huberfield and Bodner.

12. Nechemia Davidson owns 44 % of Net2Wireless

13. Partner Communications was given 14% of the N2W when they agreed to test and support N2W’s products.

14. For the six months ended June 30, 2000, and the period from commencement of operations (April 1, 1999) through December 31, 1999, Net2Wireless had net losses of approximately $129,006,000 and $493,000, respectively. The net loss at June 30,2000, includes approximately $124,664,000 of non-cash expenses relating to stock based compensation.

15. Davidson is also the founder of ECI Commutations, which is attempting another Merger with WPEC. Currently NASDAQ is investigating in regards to listing the stock. In that regard NASDAQ is asking about some of the insiders and major holders of ECI. Here is the list that the NASDAQ officials need info on
a. David Rubner;
b. Zahava Rubner;
c. Murray Huberfeld;
d. Laura Huberfeld;
e. Alexander/Rachel LLC;
f. David Bodner;
g. Naomi Bodner;
h. NBDB, LLC;
i. Broad Capital;
j. Necbemia Davidson;
k. Cedar Investments Services. Ltd.

16. In December, Jenkon completed its reverse acquisition with Multimedia KID, which develops interactive learning software for children and adults, and its shares rose to 4 9/16. They continued to climb to a high of 7 7/8 in February, for a $269 million market cap. The CEO of MKID is David Rubner.

17. On June 19, 2000 insiders register to sell 13,283,239 SHARES of MKID the stock proceeds to tank, and today is sub 1 dollar and in jeopardy of being delisted from NASDAQ

18. The Wives Club are the majority of sellers in MKID’s S3
a. Zehava Rubner to sell 2,650,000 shares (David Rubner is Chairman of the Board)
b. Naomi Bodner to sell 1,325,000 shares
c. Laura Huberfeld to sell 1,325,000 shares

19. Bodner and Huberfeld filed to sell 2.2 Million shares of USCM at 5 dollars on 5/8/1998; by the end of that year the stock was selling for 6 cents. Its now a OTC:BB

20. FUSN Fusion Networks was created out of a similar merger to that proposed by SCII. Much like the jump in SCII, the stock went form 5 dollars to 15-20 dollars after the merger was announced.
a. Bodner, Huberfeld and ML Partner are all listed on the S-4 as holders of approximately 4 million shares each of FUSN.

21. ML Partners list to sell all of its 5 Million Warrants. The owner listed is Susan Meyers, with an address in Greenwich, Connecticut. The only listing for a Susan Meyers in Connecticut comes up with a “Glenn and Susan Meyers listing. The address given is 1 mile away from the address of given for ML Partners? A search for Glenn Meyers shows the CEO of Rare Media (RRRR) as also living in Greenwich Connecticut. So it would appear that the wife of the CEO of RRRR is the entity behind ML Partners which recently came into 5 Million warrants of SCII and is now filed to sell them to the public via a SCII S-3/A. Its amazing!

22. A search of RRRR does not show any ownership by ML Partners, however it does show HUBERFELD LAURA & BODNER NAOMI PARTNERSHIP as an insider with the following sales. The last one if from the HUBERFELD BODNER FAMILY FOUNDATION
a. 21-Dec-99 370,000 RRRR Proposed Sale (Form 144) of Restricted Shares. Estimated proceeds of $12,580,000.
b. 3-Dec-99 100,000 RRRR Proposed Sale (Form 144) of Restricted Shares.Estimated proceeds of $310,000.
c. 3-Dec-99 100,000 RRRR Proposed Sale (Form 144) of Restricted Shares.Estimated proceeds of $320,000.
d. 28-Oct-99 349,500 RRRR Proposed Sale (Form 144) of Restricted Shares.Estimated proceeds of $4,849,313.
e. 4-Oct-99 75,000 RRRR Proposed Sale (Form 144) of Restricted Shares.Estimated proceeds of $825,000.
f. 23-Nov-99 200,000 RRRR Proposed Sale (Form 144) of Restricted Shares. Estimated proceeds of $6,075,000.

Now some comments on the technology
23. Davidson created both N2W and ECI companies, however in his remarks submitted to the SEC he claims that the two companies have technologies that will help each other work. Thus leaving investors without the knowledge of what N2W owns and what ECI owns. Since there are no actual specifications, N2W could in theory pay ECI money to acquire technology.

24. N2W claims to have a revolutionary means of compressing data to make video stream available over narrowband cellular networks. In the Media interviews this has been claimed as patented technology, however in the SEC filings they say they have two patent applications in. It would be remarkable for such a small company to claim such a huge enhancement without the major players having noticed it. Upon an Internet search TheTruthseeker found a report IBM. This sound remarkably similar to the claims by N2W, and the simplicity of 100 lines of code seems like a textbook application of known optimizations. IBM is not claiming patents but will profit from the inclusion of it with the chips and hardware products.
---------
IBM chip to move Internet data more quickly By News September 11, 2000, 12:20 p.m. PT
IBM said today it has developed programming built into a chip to prioritize Internet data so that more important information can move faster.
The enhancement involves a relatively few 100 lines of code, though IBM said it will make video free of jitters and Web transactions uninterrupted by synchronizing pieces of data that fit together. Internet traffic typically moves in separated bits that are reassembled at their destination.
The PowerNP network-processor chip containing the ''bandwidth allocation technology'' software is expected to be available later this year, for switches and routers used in computer networks that form the Internet, IBM said. Networking hardware makers such as Cisco Systems and Alcatel are potential customers.
Companies using the technology to help run their Web sites can assign priorities to different types of data passing through these switches to and from customers. Digital video, which can be choppy on Web sites, would be one area that would be smoother, IBM said.
news.cnet.com.

The N2W partnerships:

25. SCII first signed a deal to Merger with ITES within Israel back in October of 1999. Later N2W acquired ITES on top of that deal, without the approval of the SCII stockholders (though this was not a requirement, it does seem their interests were not represented here). The new deal with N2W cost significantly more and also establishes about double the ultimate shares of the combined companies.

26. On March 16th N2W announced the agreement for testing with Partner Communications PNTR. Partner was given 10% of N2W along with this. Its now half a year since then, and to date nothing has been signed for purchase or commercial use by Partner from N2W. The S4 says they continue to talk.

27. On March 30,2000 N2W announced an agreement for Testing with Pelephone the other large Israeli Cell phone provider. Its now half a year since then, and to date nothing has been signed for purchase or commercial use by Pelephone from N2W.

28. On July 27th a memorandum of understanding was put established for testing between Nextel and N2W. There have been no updates since. An Israeli based Internet site foreshadowed this event, with remarkable insight on June 26th. In loud opposition to the Barron’s article a reporter (who may or may not own these securities, as disclaimered by the site) reported the following

“. The major development is probably a very large contract (Maariv claims up to $100m - that is going to be signed upon completion of the merger) with Nextel Communications Inc. (NXTL), which provides digital and analog wireless communications services throughout the United States.

As far as I know, one of the top NXTL directors attended the large party that ECIL held a few weeks ago for Mr. Rubner on his departure after 30 years.

29. The simple explanation of N2W technology methods is that it adds servers into the cell phone providers’ location, when Internet addresses are requested these servers compact the data and send the compacted data across the cell line, and it is un-compacted on the other side. While it is true this does not require new cellular equipment, the server farms required (and there maintenance) are cost prohibitive, as mentioned in the SCII filings. So the short cut to 3G is possible, but it could become costly.

30. N2W says this in the SEC filings
“Wireless communication devices are mass-market consumer items with imbedded software that is difficult to modify in the field. To address this issue, the Net2Wireless' translation programs are designed to translate content in real-time. Net2Wireless intends to distribute its software to cellular carriers who can make it available to their customers either for a fee or free of charge. Software translators that transparently translate content to make it compatible with older versions of digital wireless devices may be developed by Net2Wireless in the future, depending on the demand for such software.”

This is addressing that Cellphones are not programmable and have their software hard coded onto ROMs or ASICs. It almost seems by the language that the code will self-extract itself will it is in air and be ready for the users “real-time”, it makes no sense to me.

Bottomline is that from all the information TheTruthseeker can see, any N2W solution will require new cellular handsets to work, or programmable solutions with CPU power, such as a laptop or certain PDAs.

So there you have it, I find this a strange set of circumstances and stocks. Look at the results of these stocks after the insiders file to sell, they just tank into oblivion. USCM, RRRR, MKID. Looking at FUSN it tanked as well but it seems not related to the Insider selling. Many of the folks involved in the stocks are also in SCII. Right now NASDAQ is appraising the Merger, they are on the 4th update of the S-4 now.

You also have a series of aggressive Press Releases, which moved the stock, but so far have not had the necessary bottomline follow-through. Said another way, its been 1 year since the Merger has been announced, after that year, there are no commercial users, and there are no Sales, and there are no design wins into industry standards.

I could talk more about the unregulated press recommendations and rumors, much of which is not US based, or the “Members only Message boards” which often ban posters with critical views, but these are not unique only to SCII and will have to wait for another day.

TheTruthseeker is of the belief that stocks mergers and insiders’ sales--- such as these ---are of serious concerns to the integrity of the NASDAQ Market. These are the type of stocks when they fall; destroy the faith in investors who may not understand the dynamics and risks.

TheTruthseeker has no regulatory powers.

So TheTruthseeker can only hope that those agencies and organizations that hold the check and balances to Publicly traded securities will take a hard look.

These issues are complex and it takes a real wolff to see through the maze of press releases and SEC filings.

In an Internet where TheTruthSeeker’s individual rights of freedom of speech are limited by our court system, I can only hope that the obligations and requirements of Public companies are held to the rules.

After all it’s these rules that give consumers the trust and faith that our Securities within the NASDAQ and other markets are in fact SECURE.

Its not always easy to find, its not always fun, but when you see it, you know it.
The Truth.

The TruthSeeker.......................



To: blebovits who wrote (422)12/8/2000 5:31:04 PM
From: StockDung  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 447
 
WESTERN POWER & EQUIPMENT CORP

sec.gov

a. David Rubner; b. Zahava Rubner;
c. Murray Huberfeld;
d. Laura Huberfeld;
e. Alexander/Rachel LLC;
f. David Bodner; g. Naomi Bodner;
h. NBDB, LLC; i. Broad Capital;
j. Necbemia Davidson;
k. Cedar Investments Services. Ltd.: