Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Strictly: Drilling and oil-field services -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: isopatch who wrote (80840)	12/6/2000 1:29:44 AM
From: Gottfried	Respond to of 95453

Vanguard talks about bear markets back to 1956 vanguard.com G.

To: isopatch who wrote (80840)	12/6/2000 9:55:53 AM
From: kodiak_bull	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 95453

Ah, thank goodness, the long nightmare in tech is finally over. Silly me, thinking we would hit Naz 2200 this month. Yesterday certainly proved me to be just another worrywart. Not. Last spring the Naz corrected about 10 percent in two days, then rose 4% in one day, and the talking heads on CNBC said something like: So, how do you see the Naz? Well, the correction is over. Over? Yes. In just a day? Yes. How is that possible? Well, this isn't the Old Economy, you know. Things just happen a lot faster now. I see. Yes, that certainly makes sense. <<<<<<<<< I believe the good old Naz was at about 4350 at the time of the talking heads' discussion. AAPL's bad news should throw a little water on the fire this morning, and we shall see. Since the fundamental picture hasn't changed in energy, I still believe this is the place to be. Bottomside risk, nearterm of 95, upside potential of 135, solamente dos centavos, of course.