SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ellen who wrote (102960)12/6/2000 10:40:41 AM
From: H-Man  Respond to of 769667
 
I am fully aware that Algore only wanted to recount his selected counties. That is not "Count all the votes".

Point is that given the opportunity to manually recount other counties with undervotes, he actually argued against it. That is contrary to "Count all the votes".

Algore never wanted and has never acted to count all the votes. If he got in front of any court or any legal body to request it, he might have some credibility. Problem is that if he did that, a judge just might have granted it, that would be bad for Algore. He knows that.

George Bush has had the unmitgated gall to fight Mr. Gore's attemted distortions of the Florida vote.

too bad for you

BTW

cspan.org

session 6 documents D. Boise's closing argument.



To: Ellen who wrote (102960)12/7/2000 12:51:13 PM
From: SecularBull  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
So you would be satisfied if Gore cherry-picked his way to a win?

LoF



To: Ellen who wrote (102960)12/7/2000 12:51:27 PM
From: SecularBull  Respond to of 769667
 
So you would be satisfied if Gore cherry-picked his way to a win? It would be a legitimate victory to you, even though not all of the undervotes in Florida were counted?

LoF