Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Why is Gore Trying to Steal the Presidency? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: E who wrote (3366)	12/6/2000 11:04:57 AM
From: Bill	Respond to of 3887

Thanks for the update. Are the dems claiming that poll workers threw out democrat ballot requests, as Gore claimed yesterday in his press briefing?

To: E who wrote (3366)	12/6/2000 12:35:41 PM
From: Proud_Infidel	Respond to of 3887

Gore Wants Bush Victory Set Aside by JACKIE HALLIFAX Associated Press Writer TALLAHASSEE, Fla. (AP) -- Al Gore was asking Florida's highest court Wednesday to set aside George W. Bush's certified victory in the state and allow more counting of disputed ballots to settle the ''fundamental question'' of which candidate got more votes. ''If this state's contest provision is to have any meaning, the meaning must be this: it is a mechanism for determining if state authorities certified the wrong candidate as the winner of the election,'' Gore's lawyers argued in a 50-page brief to be filed with the Florida Supreme Court. With the White House at stake, the Democrat asked the high court to overturn Leon County Circuit Court Judge N. Sanders Sauls, who upheld Bush's 537-vote victory and refused to order a hand recount of some 14,000 disputed ballots. The Associated Press obtained excerpts of the brief. Gore's team believes if the votes from Palm Beach and Miami-Dade counties are counted the vice president would overtake Bush in the statewide tally and win the state's decisive 25 electoral votes. Sauls ruled on Monday that Gore had failed to make a case why such a dramatic action should be taken nearly a month after Election Day. Bush's team was asking the high court to uphold Sauls' ruling and bring finality to the race. With time running out to name Florida's presidential electors by a Dec. 12 deadline, the high court agreed to hear Gore's appeal immediately, setting oral arguments for Thursday. On another legal front, Democrats went to court on Wednesday in hopes of getting as many as 24,000 absentee ballots thrown out because Republicans were allowed to complete ballot applications. A trial got underway in the Seminole County lawsuit, where 15,000 absentee ballots were in question. And, in a nearby courtroom, pretrial motions were made in the Martin County case, where 10,000 are in dispute. Either suit, although not openly embraced by the Gore legal team, had the potential of switching the lead in the race from Bush to Gore since Bush won the absentee ballots by a 2-to-1 margin. Republican lawyers argued in the unprecedented cases that a voter's right to be heard outweighs any technical problem with ballot applications. The state Supreme Court last month provided Democrats their greatest legal victory to date when it extended by a week the date by which counties could conduct hand recounts. After the extension failed to put Gore ahead, he challenged the certified Florida results in court, forcing a marathon weekend trial capped by Sauls' dramatic ruling from the bench Monday. Sauls rejected Gore's request for a manual recount in two counties along with his plea to overturn Bush's victory in the state that stands to pick the next president when it formally awards its electoral votes. Sauls concluded that Gore had not proven the results of the election would change even if his legal arguments won out and the court conducted hand recounts. Florida Supreme Court spokesman Craig Waters said the justices had allotted an hour Thursday for oral arguments, 30 minutes apiece. He said lawyers would discuss whether the court should decide the case as well as the issues. Joseph Lieberman, Gore's vice presidential candidate, said the Florida Supreme Court would be ''the final arbiter'' of the election dispute. Gore himself said he didn't feel ''anything other than optimistic.'' He made his biggest mention yet Tuesday of the lawsuit in Seminole County seeking to throw out as many as 15,000 absentee ballots. He is not a party to the suit but the case carries enough potential votes to make him president. The vice president said it appeared that enough applications for potential Democratic absentee votes to give him victory were thrown in ''the trash can by the supervisor of elections there.'' He said the Democratic votes were lost while Republicans were unfairly allowed to correct absentee ballot applications. Court proceedings began in Leon County Circuit Court early Wednesday on separate lawsuits alleging that Seminole and Martin county Republicans tampered with ballot application forms by adding voter identification numbers. Democrats seeking to throw out nearly 10,000 Martin County absentee ballots said Republicans not only tampered with application forms, but also were allowed to remove them from the elections supervisors' office. A judge heard a motion Wednesday to dismiss the lawsuit. The hearing was recessed after 90 minutes to allow lawyers to join the Seminole case. On other legal fronts: -- A judge in Pensacola listened as Republican lawyers urged that hundreds of rejected overseas ballots, mostly from military personnel, be counted. U.S. District Judge Lacey Collier promised a prompt ruling. -- During oral arguments in the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Atlanta, a judge asked Democratic lawyer Teresa Wynn Roseborough why it was constitutional to do manual recounts only in Florida's three largest, predominantly Democratic counties. Roseborough said every vote should be counted. The question came during arguments in a pair of related cases from Bush supporters who want the results of any hand recounts thrown out. Gore's appeal to the Florida Supreme Court was one of two election-related cases before the high court. The other, returned Monday from the U.S. Supreme Court, sought clarification of the reasoning behind the Florida court's extension of the manual recounting deadline. Written arguments were submitted by both sides Tuesday. Bush lawyers urged the court to change its mind and agree with a state judge's ruling that concluded that no recounts were allowed after a Nov. 14 deadline set in state law. Gore's legal team said the state Supreme Court should reinstate its prior ruling allowing the recounts, saying it was correct and that the justices of the nation's highest court only wanted a clarification about the legal grounds upon which the decision was based. But that ruling, if it stands, still left Bush with a 537-vote advantage over Gore. To win his latest appeal, in which he contests the state certification of Bush as the election winner in Florida, Gore must show a reasonable probability that recounts would tip the election to him and that county boards abused their discretion.