SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TigerPaw who wrote (103024)12/6/2000 11:13:19 AM
From: Sedohr Nod  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
Fox in the henhouse?????........you mean like counting dimples and imaginary votes along a straight party line? If it had been charged that someone on the other side had done this the response would have been "well....we just plain out slicked you dumb republicans again"....



To: TigerPaw who wrote (103024)12/6/2000 11:20:41 AM
From: Srexley  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
Here is the key information, T.P. I am curious if you think they should throw out all the absentee ballots if this information is true.

1) The democrat absentee applications did not have a printing error. This is a FACT that both sides agree to.

2) The repub applications went from the repub offices to the voters, then to Goard's office. The dems went from the dem offices to the voter, back to the dem offices, then to Goard's office. This means that the dems had access (although in a different location) to their applications prior to them being sent out also.

note: this was brought up by the defense in opening statement. I am assuming they will be able to prove it.

3) There is a big inference that repubs fixed their apps and threw the dems apps aside. The apps that would have been set aside had errors other than correcting the printer errors regarding the vin. Very few of these.

4) Also info in the defense opening statement that people were notified via the radio and other methods. Don't know the details yet, but looks like both sides knew of the issue.



To: TigerPaw who wrote (103024)12/6/2000 12:13:21 PM
From: Master (Hijacked)  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
"...The fox was in the henhouse, the process is contaminated. "

Mr. Logic strikes again.

Is this the same as saying that the Democratic Foxes were in the Democratic henhouse punching dimples with their Democratic Pecker?