Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Greg or e who wrote (4219)	12/6/2000 3:54:19 PM
From: Chris land	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 28931

We were just discussing JW's and guess who just now came knocking at my door? Yup! They still deny the trinity, still deny a physical resurrection, still deny that Jesus is God and still think that death is the same as being nonexistent. When all was said and done I looked straight into both their eyes and told them in all honesty that they don't know Jesus Christ at all. Of course they took offense and just remembered a prior appointment but hopefully they will take it to heart and really take a hard look at what they really believe and why Christians are so dead set against their doctrines.

To: Greg or e who wrote (4219)	12/6/2000 9:12:26 PM
From: cosmicforce	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 28931

First, the high degree of repetition on the point notwithstanding, there is absolutely no reason why God could not pick and choose whom He wished to resurrect and in what form. I'm not sure what is meant by abnormally born. If Jesus appeared in spirit (ghost form) would it have been LESS miraculous? Since Fundamentalists don't seem to believe that there should be dead people walking around as testament to Christ, I'm not sure why this point is so important. Now, I agree if this was happening, that would be compelling evidence. To me, as an outsider, it is like arguing about angels dancing on the heads of pins.