Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Amy J who wrote (120977)	12/6/2000 7:50:56 PM
From: Joe NYC	Respond to of 186894

Amy, You need to read the US SC's conclusions. The US SC didn't bother with the 14th amendment issue. There may be a misunderstanding. Bush's lawyers filed 2 separate cases. 1 has to do with FL SC ruling, the other with recounts. The recount issue is based on 14th amendment, the FL SC is not. US SC took on the FL SC case, and didn't take the recount case. The FL SC case doesn't involve 14th amendment, but the article of the constitution having to do with how the electors are chosen and a federal law stating that the rules governing the elections must be agreed upon prior to the elections, not after. In light of this, I am confused about your statement that said: But the US SC didn't bother with this, because the FL SC had asked Bush if he wanted a manual recount and Bush said no. Thus, there was no 14th amendment issue. Joe