Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ellen who wrote (103984)	12/7/2000 8:51:00 AM
From: Zoltan!	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

>>At the same time, though, the Bush campaign asked for another machine recount in Palm Beach County. Because the Palm Beach figures don't add up. The Dems created 900 additional AlGore the Loser votes during the first machine recount. They came up with more votes than ballots issued. That's impossible and speaks to the rampant Dem vote fraud scheme.

To: Ellen who wrote (103984)	12/7/2000 8:59:50 AM
From: BishopsChild	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769667

how many times do you have to post the same crap before even you believes it.........?????

To: Ellen who wrote (103984)	12/7/2000 1:33:48 PM
From: JDN	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769667

Dear Ellen: Republicans never complained about a MACHINE recount it was the HAND RECOUNT they complained about. The reason is the obvious opportunity for hanky panky by the mostly democrat boards. Plus, no one EVEN TO THIS DAY has clearly articulated the standards for the recount. There is no doubt the Broward County standards were far looser then the Palm Beach Standards and even the Palm Beach Standards were far looser then the standards that existed IN THAT OFFICE on the day of the election. The bottom line is that unless you adopt as the ONLY standard A HOLE IN THE BALLOT you raise the specter of potential mischief. JDN