Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Piffer Thread on Political Rantings and Ravings -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mph who wrote (650)	12/7/2000 5:53:04 PM
From: Original Mad Dog	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 14610

What do y'all think of this excerpt from a news article about the Fla. Sup. Ct. argument today? dailynews.yahoo.com Justice Major Harding asked whether anyone in Sauls' court held up a ballot and actually looked at it. ``Not a particular ballot your honor,'' Boies said. ``We did tender them in evidence and we asked him repeatedly to look at the ballots.'' Lots of legal cases involve more than 10,000 pieces of paper..... and yet, in a dispute that largely centers around ten thousand pieces of paper and what they mean, the court never once looked at any of the paper? Am I the only one who is a little bit troubled by that?