SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tony Viola who wrote (121066)12/7/2000 12:06:12 PM
From: The Duke of URLĀ©  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
Tony, cuts in admin are dwarfed by the cost of plant expansion. I am no dude in this area but I think in the last year and a half, the company has moved its expenditure in this category from about 3.5-5B a year to what seems to be 6-8B a year. I think there are about 6 new plants planned in addition to the "used" plants they picked up from DEC and was is fujitsu(??).

That is the real evidence of Intel's opinion of future sales. They are VERY conservative in this commitment category. And of course, you are correct in that this is not a short term indicator.

I apologize for my inexactitudness.



To: Tony Viola who wrote (121066)12/7/2000 12:18:23 PM
From: GVTucker  Respond to of 186894
 
Tony, RE: A company I worked for in a previous life, second tier to IBM, you might say, always did better in economic slowdowns because companies appreciated the lower cost of their computers than IBM's.

Did better relative to the competition or did better on an absolute basis?



To: Tony Viola who wrote (121066)12/7/2000 12:56:29 PM
From: Dan3  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
Re: A company I worked for in a previous life, second tier to IBM, you might say, always did better in economic slowdowns because companies appreciated the lower cost of their computers than IBM's.

Do you think your example holds for AMD vs. Intel?

Dan