Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: PMG who wrote (45085)	12/7/2000 2:55:11 PM
From: flatsville	Respond to of 436258

There MUST something be done (some change to the votes). Not necessarily. The judge could rule there was no violation of the Boardman case or other related laws. Absentee vote count stands. The only way out for Bush is that they come up with a solution that would change less than 932 votes. (Anything such in sight?) If she finds there was a violation, and the remedy involves a vote count change, I don't see how she could make a change that was less than 932 votes. Otherwise Gore has probably won in the end. (If not the legislature can overturn the courts, both Fla and US Supreme Court). Should Gore prevail in the Seminole case and the FLA Legislature tries to certify for Bush, well LOOK OUT...it still won't be over. If Gore only prevails is the FLA Supreme Court case (whoever?/whatever?) gets charged with the responsibility to hand count may not finsih in time...We shall see.